<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Ahar</id>
	<title>FIThydrowiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Ahar"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Ahar"/>
	<updated>2026-05-28T17:52:46Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.33.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Hydropeaking_tool&amp;diff=8397</id>
		<title>Hydropeaking tool</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Hydropeaking_tool&amp;diff=8397"/>
		<updated>2020-10-26T13:18:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ahar: /* Other information */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Note|This technology has been developed in the FIThydro project! See [[Innovative technologies from FIThydro]] for a complete list.|reminder}}&lt;br /&gt;
=Quick summary=&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:hydropeaking_tool_principle.png|thumb|250px|Figure 1: Principle of the hydropeaking tool for categorization of regulated rivers according to the potential impacts of hydropeaking on fish population (source: ).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:hydropeaking_tool_assessment.png|thumb|250px|Figure 2: Combinations of hydropeaking effects and vulnerability for total impact assessment (source:[1]).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Developed by: SINTEF Energy Research &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date: Under development&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Type: [[:Category:Tools|Tool]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Hydropeaking Tool'' was designed to assess the impacts of hydropeaking on fish populations in regulated rivers. It is available as an Excel file.&lt;br /&gt;
The hydropeaking tool is based on a method for assessing impacts from hydropeaking developed for salmonids at SINTEF Energy as a part of the [[https://www.cedren.no/english/home CEDREN]]  EnviPeak project (Norwegian Research Council, Grant number 193818). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In FIThydro, the Hydropeaking Tool has been developed also for Iberian barbel and grayling, in addition to salmonids. Factors, criteria and thresholds that determine the assessment for these species have been modified based on available literature and expert knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Application=&lt;br /&gt;
In the Hydropeaking tool, the impacts from hydropeaking are divided into two axis: direct effects from hydropeaking and vulnerability of the fish population to the additional impact from hydropeaking. The starting point is not a natural river, but a hydropower regulated river that are operating without peaking. The effect axis characterises the possible ecological impacts of peaking from how physical conditions such as flow, water level and water covered area changes, given the hydropower system and river morphology. The vulnerability axis characterises how vulnerable the system is to further influence from peaking. Both axis may be evaluated separately, but we also provide a system to combine them and obtain an overall assessment of hydropeaking (Figure 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current version of the Hydropeaking Tool is available in Microsoft Excel. The user has to enter input values for effects and vulnerability parameters for the studied river in corresponding tables. These input values can be obtained from numerical modelling, analysis of water level/discharge time series, and fieldwork.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The outputs from the Hydropeaking Tool are the score of effects factors, the score of vulnerability factors, and the score for the combined assessment (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Hydropeaking Tool aims at being used to assess existing or planned hydropeaking operations. It also gives the user a possibility to see which parameters have a low score, helping to identify where mitigation should be concentrated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant mitigation measures and test cases=&lt;br /&gt;
{{Suitable measures for Hydropeaking tool}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other information=&lt;br /&gt;
The Hydropeaking tool is described as a part of deliverable D3.2 of the FITHydro project. Application of the tool is also a part of the deliverable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant literature=&lt;br /&gt;
*Harby et al., J. 2016. A method to assess impacts from Hydropeaking. Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Melbourne, Australia.&lt;br /&gt;
*Bakken, T.H., Forseth, T and Harby (2016), Miljøvirkninger av effektkjøring: kunnskapsstatus og råd til forvaltning og industri. NINA Special Report 62, Trondheim, Norway. &lt;br /&gt;
*Forseth, T and Harby (2014), [[https://www.nina.no/archive/nina/PppBasePdf/temahefte/053.pdf A. Handbook for environmental design in regulated salmon rivers]]. NINA Special Report 53, Trondheim, Norway.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Contact information=&lt;br /&gt;
atle.harby@sintef.no&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tools]] [[Category:developed in FIThydro]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ahar</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Hydropeaking_tool&amp;diff=8396</id>
		<title>Hydropeaking tool</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Hydropeaking_tool&amp;diff=8396"/>
		<updated>2020-10-26T13:18:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ahar: /* Other information */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Note|This technology has been developed in the FIThydro project! See [[Innovative technologies from FIThydro]] for a complete list.|reminder}}&lt;br /&gt;
=Quick summary=&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:hydropeaking_tool_principle.png|thumb|250px|Figure 1: Principle of the hydropeaking tool for categorization of regulated rivers according to the potential impacts of hydropeaking on fish population (source: ).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:hydropeaking_tool_assessment.png|thumb|250px|Figure 2: Combinations of hydropeaking effects and vulnerability for total impact assessment (source:[1]).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Developed by: SINTEF Energy Research &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date: Under development&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Type: [[:Category:Tools|Tool]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Hydropeaking Tool'' was designed to assess the impacts of hydropeaking on fish populations in regulated rivers. It is available as an Excel file.&lt;br /&gt;
The hydropeaking tool is based on a method for assessing impacts from hydropeaking developed for salmonids at SINTEF Energy as a part of the [[https://www.cedren.no/english/home CEDREN]]  EnviPeak project (Norwegian Research Council, Grant number 193818). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In FIThydro, the Hydropeaking Tool has been developed also for Iberian barbel and grayling, in addition to salmonids. Factors, criteria and thresholds that determine the assessment for these species have been modified based on available literature and expert knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Application=&lt;br /&gt;
In the Hydropeaking tool, the impacts from hydropeaking are divided into two axis: direct effects from hydropeaking and vulnerability of the fish population to the additional impact from hydropeaking. The starting point is not a natural river, but a hydropower regulated river that are operating without peaking. The effect axis characterises the possible ecological impacts of peaking from how physical conditions such as flow, water level and water covered area changes, given the hydropower system and river morphology. The vulnerability axis characterises how vulnerable the system is to further influence from peaking. Both axis may be evaluated separately, but we also provide a system to combine them and obtain an overall assessment of hydropeaking (Figure 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current version of the Hydropeaking Tool is available in Microsoft Excel. The user has to enter input values for effects and vulnerability parameters for the studied river in corresponding tables. These input values can be obtained from numerical modelling, analysis of water level/discharge time series, and fieldwork.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The outputs from the Hydropeaking Tool are the score of effects factors, the score of vulnerability factors, and the score for the combined assessment (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Hydropeaking Tool aims at being used to assess existing or planned hydropeaking operations. It also gives the user a possibility to see which parameters have a low score, helping to identify where mitigation should be concentrated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant mitigation measures and test cases=&lt;br /&gt;
{{Suitable measures for Hydropeaking tool}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other information=&lt;br /&gt;
The Hydropeaking tool is a part of deliverable D3.2 of the FITHydro project. Application of the tool is also a part of the deliverable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant literature=&lt;br /&gt;
*Harby et al., J. 2016. A method to assess impacts from Hydropeaking. Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Melbourne, Australia.&lt;br /&gt;
*Bakken, T.H., Forseth, T and Harby (2016), Miljøvirkninger av effektkjøring: kunnskapsstatus og råd til forvaltning og industri. NINA Special Report 62, Trondheim, Norway. &lt;br /&gt;
*Forseth, T and Harby (2014), [[https://www.nina.no/archive/nina/PppBasePdf/temahefte/053.pdf A. Handbook for environmental design in regulated salmon rivers]]. NINA Special Report 53, Trondheim, Norway.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Contact information=&lt;br /&gt;
atle.harby@sintef.no&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tools]] [[Category:developed in FIThydro]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ahar</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Hydropeaking_tool&amp;diff=8395</id>
		<title>Hydropeaking tool</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Hydropeaking_tool&amp;diff=8395"/>
		<updated>2020-10-26T13:17:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ahar: /* Relevant literature */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Note|This technology has been developed in the FIThydro project! See [[Innovative technologies from FIThydro]] for a complete list.|reminder}}&lt;br /&gt;
=Quick summary=&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:hydropeaking_tool_principle.png|thumb|250px|Figure 1: Principle of the hydropeaking tool for categorization of regulated rivers according to the potential impacts of hydropeaking on fish population (source: ).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:hydropeaking_tool_assessment.png|thumb|250px|Figure 2: Combinations of hydropeaking effects and vulnerability for total impact assessment (source:[1]).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Developed by: SINTEF Energy Research &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date: Under development&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Type: [[:Category:Tools|Tool]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Hydropeaking Tool'' was designed to assess the impacts of hydropeaking on fish populations in regulated rivers. It is available as an Excel file.&lt;br /&gt;
The hydropeaking tool is based on a method for assessing impacts from hydropeaking developed for salmonids at SINTEF Energy as a part of the [[https://www.cedren.no/english/home CEDREN]]  EnviPeak project (Norwegian Research Council, Grant number 193818). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In FIThydro, the Hydropeaking Tool has been developed also for Iberian barbel and grayling, in addition to salmonids. Factors, criteria and thresholds that determine the assessment for these species have been modified based on available literature and expert knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Application=&lt;br /&gt;
In the Hydropeaking tool, the impacts from hydropeaking are divided into two axis: direct effects from hydropeaking and vulnerability of the fish population to the additional impact from hydropeaking. The starting point is not a natural river, but a hydropower regulated river that are operating without peaking. The effect axis characterises the possible ecological impacts of peaking from how physical conditions such as flow, water level and water covered area changes, given the hydropower system and river morphology. The vulnerability axis characterises how vulnerable the system is to further influence from peaking. Both axis may be evaluated separately, but we also provide a system to combine them and obtain an overall assessment of hydropeaking (Figure 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current version of the Hydropeaking Tool is available in Microsoft Excel. The user has to enter input values for effects and vulnerability parameters for the studied river in corresponding tables. These input values can be obtained from numerical modelling, analysis of water level/discharge time series, and fieldwork.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The outputs from the Hydropeaking Tool are the score of effects factors, the score of vulnerability factors, and the score for the combined assessment (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Hydropeaking Tool aims at being used to assess existing or planned hydropeaking operations. It also gives the user a possibility to see which parameters have a low score, helping to identify where mitigation should be concentrated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant mitigation measures and test cases=&lt;br /&gt;
{{Suitable measures for Hydropeaking tool}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other information=&lt;br /&gt;
The Hydropeaking tool will is a part of deliverable D3.2 of the FITHydro project. Application of the tool is also a part of the deliverable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant literature=&lt;br /&gt;
*Harby et al., J. 2016. A method to assess impacts from Hydropeaking. Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Melbourne, Australia.&lt;br /&gt;
*Bakken, T.H., Forseth, T and Harby (2016), Miljøvirkninger av effektkjøring: kunnskapsstatus og råd til forvaltning og industri. NINA Special Report 62, Trondheim, Norway. &lt;br /&gt;
*Forseth, T and Harby (2014), [[https://www.nina.no/archive/nina/PppBasePdf/temahefte/053.pdf A. Handbook for environmental design in regulated salmon rivers]]. NINA Special Report 53, Trondheim, Norway.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Contact information=&lt;br /&gt;
atle.harby@sintef.no&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tools]] [[Category:developed in FIThydro]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ahar</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Hydropeaking_tool&amp;diff=8393</id>
		<title>Hydropeaking tool</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Hydropeaking_tool&amp;diff=8393"/>
		<updated>2020-10-26T13:17:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ahar: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Note|This technology has been developed in the FIThydro project! See [[Innovative technologies from FIThydro]] for a complete list.|reminder}}&lt;br /&gt;
=Quick summary=&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:hydropeaking_tool_principle.png|thumb|250px|Figure 1: Principle of the hydropeaking tool for categorization of regulated rivers according to the potential impacts of hydropeaking on fish population (source: ).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:hydropeaking_tool_assessment.png|thumb|250px|Figure 2: Combinations of hydropeaking effects and vulnerability for total impact assessment (source:[1]).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Developed by: SINTEF Energy Research &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date: Under development&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Type: [[:Category:Tools|Tool]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Hydropeaking Tool'' was designed to assess the impacts of hydropeaking on fish populations in regulated rivers. It is available as an Excel file.&lt;br /&gt;
The hydropeaking tool is based on a method for assessing impacts from hydropeaking developed for salmonids at SINTEF Energy as a part of the [[https://www.cedren.no/english/home CEDREN]]  EnviPeak project (Norwegian Research Council, Grant number 193818). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In FIThydro, the Hydropeaking Tool has been developed also for Iberian barbel and grayling, in addition to salmonids. Factors, criteria and thresholds that determine the assessment for these species have been modified based on available literature and expert knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Application=&lt;br /&gt;
In the Hydropeaking tool, the impacts from hydropeaking are divided into two axis: direct effects from hydropeaking and vulnerability of the fish population to the additional impact from hydropeaking. The starting point is not a natural river, but a hydropower regulated river that are operating without peaking. The effect axis characterises the possible ecological impacts of peaking from how physical conditions such as flow, water level and water covered area changes, given the hydropower system and river morphology. The vulnerability axis characterises how vulnerable the system is to further influence from peaking. Both axis may be evaluated separately, but we also provide a system to combine them and obtain an overall assessment of hydropeaking (Figure 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current version of the Hydropeaking Tool is available in Microsoft Excel. The user has to enter input values for effects and vulnerability parameters for the studied river in corresponding tables. These input values can be obtained from numerical modelling, analysis of water level/discharge time series, and fieldwork.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The outputs from the Hydropeaking Tool are the score of effects factors, the score of vulnerability factors, and the score for the combined assessment (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Hydropeaking Tool aims at being used to assess existing or planned hydropeaking operations. It also gives the user a possibility to see which parameters have a low score, helping to identify where mitigation should be concentrated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant mitigation measures and test cases=&lt;br /&gt;
{{Suitable measures for Hydropeaking tool}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other information=&lt;br /&gt;
The Hydropeaking tool will is a part of deliverable D3.2 of the FITHydro project. Application of the tool is also a part of the deliverable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant literature=&lt;br /&gt;
*Harby et al., J. 2016. A method to assess impacts from Hydropeaking. Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Melbourne, Australia.&lt;br /&gt;
*Bakken, T.H., Forseth, T and Harby (2016), Miljøvirkninger av effektkjøring: kunnskapsstatus og råd til forvaltning og industri. NINA Special Report 62, Trondheim, Norway. &lt;br /&gt;
*Forseth, T and Harby (2014), [[https://www.nina.no/archive/nina/PppBasePdf/temahefte/053.pdf A. Handbook for environmental design in regulated salmon rivers]]. NINA Special Report 53, Trondheim, Norway. &lt;br /&gt;
*CEDREN www.cedren.no&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Contact information=&lt;br /&gt;
atle.harby@sintef.no&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tools]] [[Category:developed in FIThydro]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ahar</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Hydropeaking_tool&amp;diff=8392</id>
		<title>Hydropeaking tool</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Hydropeaking_tool&amp;diff=8392"/>
		<updated>2020-10-26T13:15:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ahar: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Note|This technology has been developed in the FIThydro project! See [[Innovative technologies from FIThydro]] for a complete list.|reminder}}&lt;br /&gt;
=Quick summary=&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:hydropeaking_tool_principle.png|thumb|250px|Figure 1: Principle of the hydropeaking tool for categorization of regulated rivers according to the potential impacts of hydropeaking on fish population (source: ).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:hydropeaking_tool_assessment.png|thumb|250px|Figure 2: Combinations of hydropeaking effects and vulnerability for total impact assessment (source:[1]).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Developed by: SINTEF Energy Research &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date: Under development&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Type: [[:Category:Tools|Tool]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Hydropeaking Tool'' was designed to assess the impacts of hydropeaking on fish populations in regulated rivers. It is available as an Excel file.&lt;br /&gt;
The hydropeaking tool is based on a method for assessing impacts from hydropeaking developed for salmonids at SINTEF Energy as a part of the [[https://www.cedren.no/english/home CEDREN]]  EnviPeak project (Norwegian Research Council, Grant number 193818). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In FIThydro, the Hydropeaking Tool has been developed also for Iberian barbel and grayling, in addition to salmonids. Factors, criteria and thresholds that determine the assessment for these species have been modified based on available literature and expert knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Application=&lt;br /&gt;
In the Hydropeaking tool, the impacts from hydropeaking are divided into two axis: direct effects from hydropeaking and vulnerability of the fish population to the additional impact from hydropeaking. The starting point is not a natural river, but a hydropower regulated river that are operating without peaking. The effect axis characterises the possible ecological impacts of peaking from how physical conditions such as flow, water level and water covered area changes, given the hydropower system and river morphology. The vulnerability axis characterises how vulnerable the system is to further influence from peaking. Both axis may be evaluated separately, but we also provide a system to combine them and obtain an overall assessment of hydropeaking (Figure 1). T&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current version of the Hydropeaking Tool is available in Microsoft Excel. The user has to enter input values for effects and vulnerability parameters for the studied river in corresponding tables. These input values can be obtained from numerical modelling, analysis of water level/discharge time series, and fieldwork.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The outputs from the Hydropeaking Tool are the score of effects factors, the score of vulnerability factors, and the score for the combined assessment (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Hydropeaking Tool aims at being used to assess existing or planned hydropeaking operations. It also gives the user a possibility to see which parameters have a low score, helping to identify where mitigation should be concentrated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant mitigation measures and test cases=&lt;br /&gt;
{{Suitable measures for Hydropeaking tool}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other information=&lt;br /&gt;
The Hydropeaking tool will is a part of deliverable D3.2 of the FITHydro project. Application of the tool is also a part of the deliverable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant literature=&lt;br /&gt;
*Harby et al., J. 2016. A method to assess impacts from Hydropeaking. Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Melbourne, Australia.&lt;br /&gt;
*Bakken, T.H., Forseth, T and Harby (2016), Miljøvirkninger av effektkjøring: kunnskapsstatus og råd til forvaltning og industri. NINA Special Report 62, Trondheim, Norway. &lt;br /&gt;
*Forseth, T and Harby (2014), A. Handbook for environmental design in regulated salmon rivers. NINA Special Report 53, Trondheim, Norway. &lt;br /&gt;
*CEDREN www.cedren.no&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Contact information=&lt;br /&gt;
atle.harby@sintef.no&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tools]] [[Category:developed in FIThydro]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ahar</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Hydropeaking_tool&amp;diff=8390</id>
		<title>Hydropeaking tool</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Hydropeaking_tool&amp;diff=8390"/>
		<updated>2020-10-26T13:11:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ahar: /* Other information */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Note|This technology has been developed in the FIThydro project! See [[Innovative technologies from FIThydro]] for a complete list.|reminder}}&lt;br /&gt;
=Quick summary=&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:hydropeaking_tool_principle.png|thumb|250px|Figure 1: Principle of the hydropeaking tool for categorization of regulated rivers according to the potential impacts of hydropeaking on fish population (source: ).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:hydropeaking_tool_assessment.png|thumb|250px|Figure 2: Combinations of hydropeaking effects and vulnerability for total impact assessment (source:[1]).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Developed by: SINTEF Energy Research &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date: Under development&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Type: [[:Category:Tools|Tool]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Hydropeaking Tool'' was designed to assess the impacts of hydropeaking on fish populations in regulated rivers. It is available as an Excel file.&lt;br /&gt;
The hydropeaking tool is based on a method for assessing impacts from hydropeaking developed for salmonids at SINTEF Energy as a part of the CEDREN EnviPeak project (Norwegian Research Council, Grant number 193818). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In FIThydro, the Hydropeaking Tool has been developed also for Iberian barbel and grayling, in addition to salmonids. Factors, criteria and thresholds that determine the assessment for these species have been modified based on available literature and expert knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Application=&lt;br /&gt;
In the Hydropeaking tool, the impacts from hydropeaking are divided into two axis: direct effects from hydropeaking and vulnerability of the fish population to the additional impact from hydropeaking. The starting point is not a natural river, but a hydropower regulated river that are operating without peaking. The effect axis characterises the possible ecological impacts of peaking from how physical conditions such as flow, water level and water covered area changes, given the hydropower system and river morphology. The vulnerability axis characterises how vulnerable the system is to further influence from peaking. Both axis may be evaluated separately, but we also provide a system to combine them and obtain an overall assessment of hydropeaking (Figure 1). T&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current version of the Hydropeaking Tool is available in Microsoft Excel. The user has to enter input values for effects and vulnerability parameters for the studied river in corresponding tables. These input values can be obtained from numerical modelling, analysis of water level/discharge time series, and fieldwork.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The outputs from the Hydropeaking Tool are the score of effects factors, the score of vulnerability factors, and the score for the combined assessment (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Hydropeaking Tool aims at being used to assess existing or planned hydropeaking operations. It also gives the user a possibility to see which parameters have a low score, helping to identify where mitigation should be concentrated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant mitigation measures and test cases=&lt;br /&gt;
{{Suitable measures for Hydropeaking tool}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other information=&lt;br /&gt;
The Hydropeaking tool will is a part of deliverable D3.2 of the FITHydro project. Application of the tool is also a part of the deliverable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant literature=&lt;br /&gt;
*Harby et al., J. 2016. A method to assess impacts from Hydropeaking. Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Melbourne, Australia.&lt;br /&gt;
*Bakken, T.H., Forseth, T and Harby (2016), Miljøvirkninger av effektkjøring: kunnskapsstatus og råd til forvaltning og industri. NINA Special Report 62, Trondheim, Norway. &lt;br /&gt;
*Forseth, T and Harby (2014), A. Handbook for environmental design in regulated salmon rivers. NINA Special Report 53, Trondheim, Norway. &lt;br /&gt;
*CEDREN www.cedren.no&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Contact information=&lt;br /&gt;
atle.harby@sintef.no&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tools]] [[Category:developed in FIThydro]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ahar</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Hydropeaking_tool&amp;diff=8388</id>
		<title>Hydropeaking tool</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Hydropeaking_tool&amp;diff=8388"/>
		<updated>2020-10-26T13:10:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ahar: /* Other information */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Note|This technology has been developed in the FIThydro project! See [[Innovative technologies from FIThydro]] for a complete list.|reminder}}&lt;br /&gt;
=Quick summary=&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:hydropeaking_tool_principle.png|thumb|250px|Figure 1: Principle of the hydropeaking tool for categorization of regulated rivers according to the potential impacts of hydropeaking on fish population (source: ).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:hydropeaking_tool_assessment.png|thumb|250px|Figure 2: Combinations of hydropeaking effects and vulnerability for total impact assessment (source:[1]).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Developed by: SINTEF Energy Research &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date: Under development&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Type: [[:Category:Tools|Tool]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Hydropeaking Tool'' was designed to assess the impacts of hydropeaking on fish populations in regulated rivers. It is available as an Excel file.&lt;br /&gt;
The hydropeaking tool is based on a method for assessing impacts from hydropeaking developed for salmonids at SINTEF Energy as a part of the CEDREN EnviPeak project (Norwegian Research Council, Grant number 193818). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In FIThydro, the Hydropeaking Tool has been developed also for Iberian barbel and grayling, in addition to salmonids. Factors, criteria and thresholds that determine the assessment for these species have been modified based on available literature and expert knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Application=&lt;br /&gt;
In the Hydropeaking tool, the impacts from hydropeaking are divided into two axis: direct effects from hydropeaking and vulnerability of the fish population to the additional impact from hydropeaking. The starting point is not a natural river, but a hydropower regulated river that are operating without peaking. The effect axis characterises the possible ecological impacts of peaking from how physical conditions such as flow, water level and water covered area changes, given the hydropower system and river morphology. The vulnerability axis characterises how vulnerable the system is to further influence from peaking. Both axis may be evaluated separately, but we also provide a system to combine them and obtain an overall assessment of hydropeaking (Figure 1). T&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current version of the Hydropeaking Tool is available in Microsoft Excel. The user has to enter input values for effects and vulnerability parameters for the studied river in corresponding tables. These input values can be obtained from numerical modelling, analysis of water level/discharge time series, and fieldwork.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The outputs from the Hydropeaking Tool are the score of effects factors, the score of vulnerability factors, and the score for the combined assessment (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Hydropeaking Tool aims at being used to assess existing or planned hydropeaking operations. It also gives the user a possibility to see which parameters have a low score, helping to identify where mitigation should be concentrated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant mitigation measures and test cases=&lt;br /&gt;
{{Suitable measures for Hydropeaking tool}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other information=&lt;br /&gt;
The Hydropeaking tool will is a part of deliverable D3.1 of the FITHydro project. It's application is a part of FIThydro deliverable D3.2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant literature=&lt;br /&gt;
*Harby et al., J. 2016. A method to assess impacts from Hydropeaking. Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Melbourne, Australia.&lt;br /&gt;
*Bakken, T.H., Forseth, T and Harby (2016), Miljøvirkninger av effektkjøring: kunnskapsstatus og råd til forvaltning og industri. NINA Special Report 62, Trondheim, Norway. &lt;br /&gt;
*Forseth, T and Harby (2014), A. Handbook for environmental design in regulated salmon rivers. NINA Special Report 53, Trondheim, Norway. &lt;br /&gt;
*CEDREN www.cedren.no&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Contact information=&lt;br /&gt;
atle.harby@sintef.no&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tools]] [[Category:developed in FIThydro]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ahar</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Hydropeaking_tool&amp;diff=8386</id>
		<title>Hydropeaking tool</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Hydropeaking_tool&amp;diff=8386"/>
		<updated>2020-10-26T13:09:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ahar: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Note|This technology has been developed in the FIThydro project! See [[Innovative technologies from FIThydro]] for a complete list.|reminder}}&lt;br /&gt;
=Quick summary=&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:hydropeaking_tool_principle.png|thumb|250px|Figure 1: Principle of the hydropeaking tool for categorization of regulated rivers according to the potential impacts of hydropeaking on fish population (source: ).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:hydropeaking_tool_assessment.png|thumb|250px|Figure 2: Combinations of hydropeaking effects and vulnerability for total impact assessment (source:[1]).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Developed by: SINTEF Energy Research &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date: Under development&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Type: [[:Category:Tools|Tool]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Hydropeaking Tool'' was designed to assess the impacts of hydropeaking on fish populations in regulated rivers. It is available as an Excel file.&lt;br /&gt;
The hydropeaking tool is based on a method for assessing impacts from hydropeaking developed for salmonids at SINTEF Energy as a part of the CEDREN EnviPeak project (Norwegian Research Council, Grant number 193818). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In FIThydro, the Hydropeaking Tool has been developed also for Iberian barbel and grayling, in addition to salmonids. Factors, criteria and thresholds that determine the assessment for these species have been modified based on available literature and expert knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Application=&lt;br /&gt;
In the Hydropeaking tool, the impacts from hydropeaking are divided into two axis: direct effects from hydropeaking and vulnerability of the fish population to the additional impact from hydropeaking. The starting point is not a natural river, but a hydropower regulated river that are operating without peaking. The effect axis characterises the possible ecological impacts of peaking from how physical conditions such as flow, water level and water covered area changes, given the hydropower system and river morphology. The vulnerability axis characterises how vulnerable the system is to further influence from peaking. Both axis may be evaluated separately, but we also provide a system to combine them and obtain an overall assessment of hydropeaking (Figure 1). T&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current version of the Hydropeaking Tool is available in Microsoft Excel. The user has to enter input values for effects and vulnerability parameters for the studied river in corresponding tables. These input values can be obtained from numerical modelling, analysis of water level/discharge time series, and fieldwork.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The outputs from the Hydropeaking Tool are the score of effects factors, the score of vulnerability factors, and the score for the combined assessment (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Hydropeaking Tool aims at being used to assess existing or planned hydropeaking operations. It also gives the user a possibility to see which parameters have a low score, helping to identify where mitigation should be concentrated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant mitigation measures and test cases=&lt;br /&gt;
{{Suitable measures for Hydropeaking tool}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other information=&lt;br /&gt;
The Hydropeaking tool will be a deliverable of the FITHydro project.&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant literature=&lt;br /&gt;
*Harby et al., J. 2016. A method to assess impacts from Hydropeaking. Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Melbourne, Australia.&lt;br /&gt;
*Bakken, T.H., Forseth, T and Harby (2016), Miljøvirkninger av effektkjøring: kunnskapsstatus og råd til forvaltning og industri. NINA Special Report 62, Trondheim, Norway. &lt;br /&gt;
*Forseth, T and Harby (2014), A. Handbook for environmental design in regulated salmon rivers. NINA Special Report 53, Trondheim, Norway. &lt;br /&gt;
*CEDREN www.cedren.no&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Contact information=&lt;br /&gt;
atle.harby@sintef.no&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tools]] [[Category:developed in FIThydro]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ahar</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=COSH-tool&amp;diff=8385</id>
		<title>COSH-tool</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=COSH-tool&amp;diff=8385"/>
		<updated>2020-10-26T13:03:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ahar: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Note|This technology has been enhanced in the FIThydro project! See [[Innovative technologies from FIThydro]] for a complete list.|reminder}}&lt;br /&gt;
=Quick summary=&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:cosh_tool_lundesoka.png|thumb|250px|Figure 1: The river Lundesokna in Norway downstream of a peaking hydropower plant. COSH-Tool can be used to asses many aspects of peaking operations (source:SINTEF Energy Research).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:cosh_tool_parameters.png|thumb|250px|Figure 2: List of parameters computed by COSH-Tool (click to expand) (source:SINTEF Energy Research).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:cosh_tool_peaks_hour.png|thumb|250px|Figure 3: Distribution of peak events though the day (click to expand)(source:SINTEF Energy Research).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:cosh_tool_peaks_day.png|thumb|250px|Figure 4: Number of peak events per day for each year of the time series (click to expand)(source:SINTEF Energy Research).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:cosh_tool_light.png|thumb|250px|Figure 5: Distribution of peak events (increasing events) per month according to light conditions (click to expand)(source:SINTEF Energy Research).]]&lt;br /&gt;
Developed by: SINTEF Energy Research&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date: 27-11-2018&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Type: Tool (computer model) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
COSH-Tool is a software written in [https://www.python.org Python] used for quantifying fluctuations in water level and discharge which may occur in rivers subjected to hydropeaking. COSH-Tool was developed at SINTEF Energy as a part of the [https://www.cedren.no/english/home CEDREN] EnviPeak project (Norwegian Research Council, Grant number 193818), with the aim of providing characteristics of hydropeaking events in regulated rivers, in order to classify the hydropeaking regimes of rivers.&lt;br /&gt;
The tool enables the analysis of long time series of water level or discharge by applying an automated processing to the time series. It provides a set of indicators that characterize fluctuations of water level and discharge in rivers and lakes/reservoirs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Application=&lt;br /&gt;
COSH-Tool can be applied to any water level or discharge time series provided by measurements (field work) or simulation (numerical modelling). The analysis of the time series with COSH-Tool does not require any coding from the user and is executed through an interface.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Input files: &lt;br /&gt;
The input file is a water level or discharge time series. COSH-Tool handles time series with any resolution, typically with time steps ranging from minutes to hours.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Output files: &lt;br /&gt;
COSH-Tool computes a set of parameters that characterise water level and discharge fluctuations. The parameters can be classified in three categories of fluctuations: 1) magnitude ; 2) timing and rapidity; and 3) frequency. The parameters are listed in Figure 2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The output from COSH-Tool consists in a table with statistics of the magnitude and timing parameters (category 1 and 2) and a set of corresponding graphs. Statistics are min, max, mean, median, standard deviation and percentiles. They can be computed for the entire time series, as well as on a monthly, seasonal and annual basis. Statistics are also displayed in the form of box plots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
COSH-Tool also provides values and graphs for all frequency parameters (category 3), namely distribution of peaks throughout the day (Figure 3), number of peaks per day for each year of the time series (Figure 4), and total number of peak events per year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, the light conditions (day, twilight, darkness) at the time of the occurrence of the peaks can be computed. A graph provides the proportion of peaks occurring at the different types of light conditions per month (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant mitigation measures and test cases=&lt;br /&gt;
{{Suitable measures for COSH-tool}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other information=&lt;br /&gt;
The COSH-Tool is free to use after agreement with SINTEF Energy Research.&lt;br /&gt;
=Contact information=&lt;br /&gt;
Julie.charmasson@sintef.no&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
lennart.schonfelder@sintef.no&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant literature=&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260442647_A_computational_tool_for_the_characterisation_of_rapid_fluctuations_in_flow_and_stage_in_rivers_caused_by_hydropeaking Sauterleute J. and Charmasson J. 2014]. A computational tool for the characterisation of rapid fluctuations in flow and stage in rivers caused by hydropeaking. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;55&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;:266-278.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://proceedings.ise2016.org/tracks/1105/abstract/26774.html Charmasson, J. 2016]. COSH-Tool, a computational tool for the characterization of rapid fluctuations in flow and stage in rivers caused by hydropeaking. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Melbourne, Australia.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Caetano, L., Pinheiro, A. and Boavida, I. 2018. Analysis of the effects of a hydropower plant in the downstream fish habitat. COSH-tool application. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Proceedings of 12th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Tokyo, Japan.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tools]] [[Category:Enhanced in FIThydro]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ahar</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=COSH-tool&amp;diff=8384</id>
		<title>COSH-tool</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=COSH-tool&amp;diff=8384"/>
		<updated>2020-10-26T13:03:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ahar: /* Contact information */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Note|This technology has been enhanced in the FIThydro project! See [[Innovative technologies from FIThydro]] for a complete list.|reminder}}&lt;br /&gt;
=Quick summary=&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:cosh_tool_lundesoka.png|thumb|250px|Figure 1: The river Lundesokna in Norway downstream of a peaking hydropower plant. COSH-Tool can be used to asses many aspects of peaking operations (source:SINTEF Energy Research).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:cosh_tool_parameters.png|thumb|250px|Figure 2: List of parameters computed by COSH-Tool (click to expand) (source:SINTEF Energy Research).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:cosh_tool_peaks_hour.png|thumb|250px|Figure 3: Distribution of peak events though the day (click to expand)(source:SINTEF Energy Research).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:cosh_tool_peaks_day.png|thumb|250px|Figure 4: Number of peak events per day for each year of the time series (click to expand)(source:SINTEF Energy Research).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:cosh_tool_light.png|thumb|250px|Figure 5: Distribution of peak events (increasing events) per month according to light conditions (click to expand)(source:SINTEF Energy Research).]]&lt;br /&gt;
Developed by: SINTEF Energy Research&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date: 27-11-2018&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Type: Tool (computer model) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
COSH-Tool is a software written in [https://www.python.org Python] used for quantifying fluctuations in water level and discharge which may occur in rivers subjected to hydropeaking. COSH-Tool was developed at SINTEF Energy as a part of the [https://www.cedren.no/english/home CEDREN] EnviPeak project (Norwegian Research Council, Grant number 193818), with the aim of providing characteristics of hydropeaking events in regulated rivers, in order to classify the hydropeaking regimes of rivers.&lt;br /&gt;
The tool enables the analysis of long time series of water level or discharge by applying an automated processing to the time series. It provides a set of indicators that characterize fluctuations of water level and discharge in rivers and lakes/reservoirs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Application=&lt;br /&gt;
COSH-Tool can be applied to any water level or discharge time series provided by measurements (field work) or simulation (numerical modelling). The analysis of the time series with COSH-Tool does not require any coding from the user and is executed through an interface.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Input files: &lt;br /&gt;
The input file is a water level or discharge time series. COSH-Tool handles time series with any resolution, typically with time steps ranging from minutes to hours.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Output files: &lt;br /&gt;
COSH-Tool computes a set of parameters that characterise water level and discharge fluctuations. The parameters can be classified in three categories of fluctuations: 1) magnitude ; 2) timing and rapidity; and 3) frequency. The parameters are listed in Figure 2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The output from COSH-Tool consists in a table with statistics of the magnitude and timing parameters (category 1 and 2) and a set of corresponding graphs. Statistics are min, max, mean, median, standard deviation and percentiles. They can be computed for the entire time series, as well as on a monthly, seasonal and annual basis. Statistics are also displayed in the form of box plots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
COSH-Tool also provides values and graphs for all frequency parameters (category 3), namely distribution of peaks throughout the day (Figure 3), number of peaks per day for each year of the time series (Figure 4), and total number of peak events per year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, the light conditions (day, twilight, darkness) at the time of the occurrence of the peaks can be computed. A graph provides the proportion of peaks occurring at the different types of light conditions per month (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant mitigation measures and test cases=&lt;br /&gt;
{{Suitable measures for COSH-tool}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other information=&lt;br /&gt;
The COSH-Tool is free to use after agreement with SINTEF Energy Research.&lt;br /&gt;
=Contact information=&lt;br /&gt;
Julie.charmasson@sintef.no&lt;br /&gt;
lennart.schonfelder@sintef.no&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant literature=&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260442647_A_computational_tool_for_the_characterisation_of_rapid_fluctuations_in_flow_and_stage_in_rivers_caused_by_hydropeaking Sauterleute J. and Charmasson J. 2014]. A computational tool for the characterisation of rapid fluctuations in flow and stage in rivers caused by hydropeaking. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;55&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;:266-278.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://proceedings.ise2016.org/tracks/1105/abstract/26774.html Charmasson, J. 2016]. COSH-Tool, a computational tool for the characterization of rapid fluctuations in flow and stage in rivers caused by hydropeaking. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Melbourne, Australia.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Caetano, L., Pinheiro, A. and Boavida, I. 2018. Analysis of the effects of a hydropower plant in the downstream fish habitat. COSH-tool application. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Proceedings of 12th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Tokyo, Japan.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tools]] [[Category:Enhanced in FIThydro]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ahar</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=COSH-tool&amp;diff=8383</id>
		<title>COSH-tool</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=COSH-tool&amp;diff=8383"/>
		<updated>2020-10-26T13:02:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ahar: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Note|This technology has been enhanced in the FIThydro project! See [[Innovative technologies from FIThydro]] for a complete list.|reminder}}&lt;br /&gt;
=Quick summary=&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:cosh_tool_lundesoka.png|thumb|250px|Figure 1: The river Lundesokna in Norway downstream of a peaking hydropower plant. COSH-Tool can be used to asses many aspects of peaking operations (source:SINTEF Energy Research).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:cosh_tool_parameters.png|thumb|250px|Figure 2: List of parameters computed by COSH-Tool (click to expand) (source:SINTEF Energy Research).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:cosh_tool_peaks_hour.png|thumb|250px|Figure 3: Distribution of peak events though the day (click to expand)(source:SINTEF Energy Research).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:cosh_tool_peaks_day.png|thumb|250px|Figure 4: Number of peak events per day for each year of the time series (click to expand)(source:SINTEF Energy Research).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:cosh_tool_light.png|thumb|250px|Figure 5: Distribution of peak events (increasing events) per month according to light conditions (click to expand)(source:SINTEF Energy Research).]]&lt;br /&gt;
Developed by: SINTEF Energy Research&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date: 27-11-2018&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Type: Tool (computer model) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
COSH-Tool is a software written in [https://www.python.org Python] used for quantifying fluctuations in water level and discharge which may occur in rivers subjected to hydropeaking. COSH-Tool was developed at SINTEF Energy as a part of the [https://www.cedren.no/english/home CEDREN] EnviPeak project (Norwegian Research Council, Grant number 193818), with the aim of providing characteristics of hydropeaking events in regulated rivers, in order to classify the hydropeaking regimes of rivers.&lt;br /&gt;
The tool enables the analysis of long time series of water level or discharge by applying an automated processing to the time series. It provides a set of indicators that characterize fluctuations of water level and discharge in rivers and lakes/reservoirs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Application=&lt;br /&gt;
COSH-Tool can be applied to any water level or discharge time series provided by measurements (field work) or simulation (numerical modelling). The analysis of the time series with COSH-Tool does not require any coding from the user and is executed through an interface.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Input files: &lt;br /&gt;
The input file is a water level or discharge time series. COSH-Tool handles time series with any resolution, typically with time steps ranging from minutes to hours.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Output files: &lt;br /&gt;
COSH-Tool computes a set of parameters that characterise water level and discharge fluctuations. The parameters can be classified in three categories of fluctuations: 1) magnitude ; 2) timing and rapidity; and 3) frequency. The parameters are listed in Figure 2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The output from COSH-Tool consists in a table with statistics of the magnitude and timing parameters (category 1 and 2) and a set of corresponding graphs. Statistics are min, max, mean, median, standard deviation and percentiles. They can be computed for the entire time series, as well as on a monthly, seasonal and annual basis. Statistics are also displayed in the form of box plots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
COSH-Tool also provides values and graphs for all frequency parameters (category 3), namely distribution of peaks throughout the day (Figure 3), number of peaks per day for each year of the time series (Figure 4), and total number of peak events per year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, the light conditions (day, twilight, darkness) at the time of the occurrence of the peaks can be computed. A graph provides the proportion of peaks occurring at the different types of light conditions per month (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant mitigation measures and test cases=&lt;br /&gt;
{{Suitable measures for COSH-tool}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other information=&lt;br /&gt;
The COSH-Tool is free to use after agreement with SINTEF Energy Research.&lt;br /&gt;
=Contact information=&lt;br /&gt;
Julie.charmasson@sintef.no&lt;br /&gt;
lennart.schonfelder@sintef.no&lt;br /&gt;
=Relevant literature=&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260442647_A_computational_tool_for_the_characterisation_of_rapid_fluctuations_in_flow_and_stage_in_rivers_caused_by_hydropeaking Sauterleute J. and Charmasson J. 2014]. A computational tool for the characterisation of rapid fluctuations in flow and stage in rivers caused by hydropeaking. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;55&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;:266-278.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://proceedings.ise2016.org/tracks/1105/abstract/26774.html Charmasson, J. 2016]. COSH-Tool, a computational tool for the characterization of rapid fluctuations in flow and stage in rivers caused by hydropeaking. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Melbourne, Australia.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Caetano, L., Pinheiro, A. and Boavida, I. 2018. Analysis of the effects of a hydropower plant in the downstream fish habitat. COSH-tool application. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Proceedings of 12th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Tokyo, Japan.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tools]] [[Category:Enhanced in FIThydro]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ahar</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Anundsj%C3%B6_test_case&amp;diff=8379</id>
		<title>Anundsjö test case</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Anundsj%C3%B6_test_case&amp;diff=8379"/>
		<updated>2020-10-26T12:46:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ahar: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Test cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Fact box for Anundsjö}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Relevant SMTDs for Anundsjö}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
The Test Case is located on the small river Mo (Moälven) in the northern part of Sweden. The hydrology of the river Mo is typical for north of Sweden, with a lot of snow in the winter, a spring flood when the snow melts, low flows during the summer and often some higher flows and an autumn flood before the next winter starts with snow accumulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The catchment area is 820 km&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. Mean annual precipitation for the whole catchment area is approx. 727 mm per year, with a mean flow at the outlet into the Baltic Sea of 27.9 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s, and 10.2 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s at the HPP Anundsjö.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=About the hydropower plant=&lt;br /&gt;
The HPP is impounding a small reservoir, releasing the water through the turbines and a tunnel back into the river about 4km further downstream. It has an installed capacity of 5 MW. The mean annual discharge is 10 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s with a low flow of 2.21 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s.&lt;br /&gt;
===Layout===&lt;br /&gt;
A small reservoir of 0.5 ha is located upstream of the HPP Anundsjö. A larger reservoir is located in a tributary about 10km further upstream, providing water releases during winter. There are important areas of spawning for salmon and trout further upstream. The bypassed river reach between the dam and the outlet of the power plant is 4 km. This bypassed river reach receives an environmental flow release.&lt;br /&gt;
===The Operator: Statkraft===&lt;br /&gt;
Statkraft is a leading company in hydropower internationally and Europe’s largest generator of renewable energy. The Group produces hydropower, wind power, solar power, gas-fired power and supplies district heating. Statkraft is a global company in energy market operations. It is Norway's largest and the Nordic region's second largest power producer. [https://www.statkraft.com/ Read more.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Pressures on the water body's ecosystem=&lt;br /&gt;
Due to two dams downstream of the HPP, for which the fish passage efficiency is unknown, the continuity is moderate. Most parts of the rapids further downstream have been modified for timber floating, with only a few being restored. Furthermore, the hydrology directly downstream of the power plant outlet is affected by short-time regulation. The water level in the small reservoir may fluctuate by up to 0.5 m. A recurring problem in Sweden is pollution through Mercury, which is released from the ground through logging activities, causing a moderate pollution of the water body.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Test case topics=&lt;br /&gt;
===Fish population===&lt;br /&gt;
The fish species that can be found in the Mo are: salmon, sea trout, grayling, pike, perch, brown trout and crayfish.&lt;br /&gt;
During the summer from July to October, the power plant is shut down twice a week for one hour, releasing the discharge through the gates in order attract salmon into the residual area. However, after one hour this flow has still not reached downstream to the outlet of the power plant.&lt;br /&gt;
===Downstream migration===&lt;br /&gt;
To facilitate better downstream fish migration, a floating guidance device is attached right next to the intake, leading the fish into a smolt trap and then out to the downstream side of the dam. The license of 2012 states that this device shall be placed out 1 May every year and water released in the smolt trap shall be 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s. This solution was evaluated together with the authorities after the first year, 2016, and the conclusion was that it did not work as intended. In 2017 a new solution with fishing nets was tested, leading the smolts to the fishway instead. The water released to the smolt trap was then instead released to go through the fishway. The starting time for the installation fot he guidance device is moved to a flexible time due to when the reservoir is ice-free.&lt;br /&gt;
===Upstream migration===&lt;br /&gt;
The upstream migrating fish encounter the outlet of the power plant, located 4 km downstream the fishway. The attraction flow is represented by the minimum flow, 0.8 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s between the 15th of July and the 5th of October; 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s the rest of the year. At the end of the 4 km long residual area the upstream migration continues in the nature-like fishway. At the end of the nature-like fishway, there is a short concrete fish ladder for the final ascent into the reservoir.&lt;br /&gt;
===E-flow===&lt;br /&gt;
In the new license from 2012, the requirements are release of water in the fishway between the 15th of July and the 5th of October of 0.8 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s and the rest of the year 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s. During the same period one hour every Tuesday and Thursday, the power plant must shut down and release the full discharge through the gates in order to attract salmon up in the residual area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Research objectives and tasks=&lt;br /&gt;
The overall question at the HPP Anundsjö is how FIThydro can improve the situation for fish by different measures and means around the HPP. This includes the situation for the salmon smolt, which are mainly arriving at the HPP after being released in the upstream area. It also includes the situation of juvenile fish of different species as well as the possibility for salmon to pass on the way to spawn and back (influenced also by the HPP located downstream of Anundsjö and influencing especially the number of migrating fish).&lt;br /&gt;
===Research tasks===&lt;br /&gt;
The research tasks and field studies conducted at Anundsjö are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hydrodynamic conditions in the reservoir and their impact on downstream smolt migration&lt;br /&gt;
* Physical conditions in the nature-like fishway and its functionality for upstream migration of salmon&lt;br /&gt;
* Access and attraction to the bypassed river reach for upstream migration&lt;br /&gt;
* Use of advanced methods for mapping of bathymetry, measurements of water velocity and modelling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
The work focused on the reservoir (CNRS, SWECO, NTNU), the bypassed river reach with the fishway (NTNU) and the junction of the hydropower plant tunnel outlet and the river (TUM, SWECO, NTNU).  A telemetry study with smolt covered even a larger area including a stretch of the river upstream the reservoir and the downstream area until the bay of Örnsköldsvik (INBO). Scenario modelling applying different mitigation measures in a Bayesian network have been applied to show cost-effective ways of mitigating negative impacts (SINTEF). The hydropower scheduling model SHOP has been applied to show the lost or gained income from power production with different scenarios of releasing eFlows (SINTEF). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP)|ADCP]] was used to map the bathymetry of the reservoir, serving as input for hydrodynamic modelling. Combined with telemetry study of smolts, it is clear that the current configuration of a floating debris collector and a guidance device actually prevents smolts from finding a safe downstream migration pathway. The telemetry study shows that only 1 smolt managed to find a safe way for downstream migration when released in the bypass section just below the dam. The one-hour release of water to the bypassed reach of river twice a week, do not reach the confluence of the hydropower plant outlet and the river within an hour, and the attraction effect is not very clear. Water velocities seem to be too low to allow migration into bypassed reach without additional release of water. Detailed measurements of water velocities by [[Acoustic Doppler velocimetry (ADV)|ADV]], and the use of drones and the [[Structure from motion (SfM)|Structure-from-motion-method]] to create bathymetry was used to validate the new [[Double Averaging method|double-averaging method]] of hydrodynamic modelling in 3D. The study to include costs of lost power production showed that it would be more efficient to release eFlow during 2 hours at night time instead of releasing it twice during 1 hour per week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Gallery=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=packed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_reservoir.jpg|Reservoir at the Anundsjö hydropower plant.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_fishway.jpg|Aerial view of the Anundsjö upstream migration fishway.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_spillway.jpg|Downstream view of the Anundsjö dam spillway&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_fishpass_intake.jpg|Intake to the Anundsjö fishway.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_layout.png|Layout of the Anundsjö hydropower plant and surrounding area.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_floating_migration.png|Floating downstream fish migration device at Anundsjö hydropower plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ahar</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Anundsj%C3%B6_test_case&amp;diff=8378</id>
		<title>Anundsjö test case</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Anundsj%C3%B6_test_case&amp;diff=8378"/>
		<updated>2020-10-26T12:44:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ahar: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Test cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Fact box for Anundsjö}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Relevant SMTDs for Anundsjö}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
The Test Case is located on the small river Mo (Moälven) in the northern part of Sweden. The hydrology of the river Mo is typical for north of Sweden, with a lot of snow in the winter, a spring flood when the snow melts, low flows during the summer and often some higher flows and an autumn flood before the next winter starts with snow accumulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The catchment area is 820 km&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. Mean annual precipitation for the whole catchment area is approx. 727 mm per year, with a mean flow at the outlet into the Baltic Sea of 27.9 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s, and 10.2 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s at the HPP Anundsjö.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=About the hydropower plant=&lt;br /&gt;
The HPP is impounding a small reservoir, releasing the water through the turbines and a tunnel back into the river about 4km further downstream. It has an installed capacity of 5 MW. The mean annual discharge is 10 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s with a low flow of 2.21 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s.&lt;br /&gt;
===Layout===&lt;br /&gt;
A small reservoir of 0.5 ha is located upstream of the HPP Anundsjö. A larger reservoir is located in a tributary about 10km further upstream, providing water releases during winter. There are important areas of spawning for salmon and trout further upstream. The bypassed river reach between the dam and the outlet of the power plant is 4 km. This bypassed river reach receives an environmental flow release.&lt;br /&gt;
===The Operator: Statkraft===&lt;br /&gt;
Statkraft is a leading company in hydropower internationally and Europe’s largest generator of renewable energy. The Group produces hydropower, wind power, solar power, gas-fired power and supplies district heating. Statkraft is a global company in energy market operations. It is Norway's largest and the Nordic region's second largest power producer. [https://www.statkraft.com/ Read more.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Pressures on the water body's ecosystem=&lt;br /&gt;
Due to two dams downstream of the HPP, for which the fish passage efficiency is unknown, the continuity is moderate. Most parts of the rapids further downstream have been modified for timber floating, with only a few being restored. Furthermore, the hydrology directly downstream of the power plant outlet is affected by short-time regulation. The water level in the small reservoir may fluctuate by up to 0.5 m. A recurring problem in Sweden is pollution through Mercury, which is released from the ground through logging activities, causing a moderate pollution of the water body.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Test case topics=&lt;br /&gt;
===Fish population===&lt;br /&gt;
The fish species that can be found in the Mo are: salmon, sea trout, grayling, pike, perch, brown trout and crayfish.&lt;br /&gt;
During the summer from July to October, the power plant is shut down twice a week for one hour, releasing the discharge through the gates in order attract salmon into the residual area. However, after one hour this flow has still not reached downstream to the outlet of the power plant.&lt;br /&gt;
===Downstream migration===&lt;br /&gt;
To facilitate better downstream fish migration, a floating guidance device is attached right next to the intake, leading the fish into a smolt trap and then out to the downstream side of the dam. The license of 2012 states that this device shall be placed out 1 May every year and water released in the smolt trap shall be 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s. This solution was evaluated together with the authorities after the first year, 2016, and the conclusion was that it did not work as intended. In 2017 a new solution with fishing nets was tested, leading the smolts to the fishway instead. The water released to the smolt trap was then instead released to go through the fishway. The starting time for the installation fot he guidance device is moved to a flexible time due to when the reservoir is ice-free.&lt;br /&gt;
===Upstream migration===&lt;br /&gt;
The upstream migrating fish encounter the outlet of the power plant, located 4 km downstream the fishway. The attraction flow is represented by the minimum flow, 0.8 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s between the 15th of July and the 5th of October; 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s the rest of the year. At the end of the 4 km long residual area the upstream migration continues in the nature-like fishway. At the end of the nature-like fishway, there is a short concrete fish ladder for the final ascent into the reservoir.&lt;br /&gt;
===E-flow===&lt;br /&gt;
In the new license from 2012, the requirements are release of water in the fishway between the 15th of July and the 5th of October of 0.8 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s and the rest of the year 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s. During the same period one hour every Tuesday and Thursday, the power plant must shut down and release the full discharge through the gates in order to attract salmon up in the residual area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Research objectives and tasks=&lt;br /&gt;
The overall question at the HPP Anundsjö is how FIThydro can improve the situation for fish by different measures and means around the HPP. This includes the situation for the salmon smolt, which are mainly arriving at the HPP after being released in the upstream area. It also includes the situation of juvenile fish of different species as well as the possibility for salmon to pass on the way to spawn and back (influenced also by the HPP located downstream of Anundsjö and influencing especially the number of migrating fish).&lt;br /&gt;
===Research tasks===&lt;br /&gt;
The research tasks and field studies conducted at Anundsjö are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hydrodynamic conditions in the reservoir and their impact on downstream smolt migration&lt;br /&gt;
* Physical conditions in the nature-like fishway and its functionality for upstream migration of salmon&lt;br /&gt;
* Access and attraction to the bypassed river reach for upstream migration&lt;br /&gt;
* Use of advanced methods for mapping of bathymetry, measurements of water velocity and modelling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
The work focused on the reservoir (CNRS, SWECO, NTNU), the bypassed river reach with the fishway (NTNU) and the junction of the hydropower plant tunnel outlet and the river (TUM, SWECO, NTNU).  A telemetry study with smolt covered even a larger area including a stretch of the river upstream the reservoir and the downstream area until the bay of Örnsköldsvik (INBO). Scenario modelling applying different mitigation measures in a Bayesian network have been applied to show cost-effective ways of mitigating negative impacts (SINTEF). The hydropower scheduling model SHOP has been applied to show the lost or gained income from power production with different scenarios of releasing eFlows (SINTEF). This study showed that it would be more efficient to release eFlow during 2 hours at night time instead of releasing it twice during 1 hour per week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP)|ADCP]] was used to map the bathymetry of the reservoir, serving as input for hydrodynamic modelling. Combined with telemetry study of smolts, it is clear that the current configuration of a floating debris collector and a guidance device actually prevents smolts from finding a safe downstream migration pathway. The telemetry study shows that only 1 smolt managed to find a safe way for downstream migration when released in the bypass section just below the dam. The one-hour release of water to the bypassed reach of river twice a week, do not reach the confluence of the hydropower plant outlet and the river within an hour, and the attraction effect is not very clear. Water velocities seem to be too low to allow migration into bypassed reach without additional release of water. Detailed measurements of water velocities by [[Acoustic Doppler velocimetry (ADV)|ADV]], and the use of drones and the [[Structure from motion (SfM)|Structure-from-motion-method]] to create bathymetry was used to validate the new [[Double Averaging method|double-averaging method]] of hydrodynamic modelling in 3D.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Gallery=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=packed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_reservoir.jpg|Reservoir at the Anundsjö hydropower plant.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_fishway.jpg|Aerial view of the Anundsjö upstream migration fishway.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_spillway.jpg|Downstream view of the Anundsjö dam spillway&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_fishpass_intake.jpg|Intake to the Anundsjö fishway.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_layout.png|Layout of the Anundsjö hydropower plant and surrounding area.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_floating_migration.png|Floating downstream fish migration device at Anundsjö hydropower plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ahar</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Anundsj%C3%B6_test_case&amp;diff=6356</id>
		<title>Anundsjö test case</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Anundsj%C3%B6_test_case&amp;diff=6356"/>
		<updated>2020-05-11T06:46:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ahar: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Test cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Fact box for Anundsjö}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Relevant SMTDs for Anundsjö}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
The Test Case is located on the small river Mo (Moälven) in the northern part of Sweden. The hydrology of the river Mo is typical for north of Sweden, with a lot of snow in the winter, a spring flood when the snow melts, low flows during the summer and often some higher flows and an autumn flood before the next winter starts with snow accumulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The catchment area is 820 km&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. Mean annual precipitation for the whole catchment area is approx. 727 mm per year, with a mean flow at the outlet into the Baltic Sea of 27.9 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s, and 10.2 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s at the HPP Anundsjø.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=About the hydropower plant=&lt;br /&gt;
The HPP is impounding a small reservoir, releasing the water through the turbines and a tunnel back into the river about 4km further downstream. It has an installed capacity of 5 MW. The mean annual discharge is 10 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s with a low flow of 2.21 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s.&lt;br /&gt;
===Layout===&lt;br /&gt;
A small reservoir of 0.5 ha is located upstream of the HPP Anundsjø. A larger reservoir is located in a tributary about 10km further upstream, providing water releases during winter. There are important areas of spawning for salmon and trout further upstream. The bypassed river reach between the dam and the outlet of the power plant is 4 km. This bypassed river reach receives an environmental flow release.&lt;br /&gt;
===The Operator: Statkraft===&lt;br /&gt;
Statkraft is a leading company in hydropower internationally and Europe’s largest generator of renewable energy. The Group produces hydropower, wind power, solar power, gas-fired power and supplies district heating. Statkraft is a global company in energy market operations. It is Norway's largest and the Nordic region's second largest power producer. [https://www.statkraft.com/ Read more.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Pressures on the water body's ecosystem=&lt;br /&gt;
Due to two dams downstream of the HPP, for which the fish passage efficiency is unknown, the continuity is moderate. Most parts of the rapids further downstream have been modified for timber floating, with only a few being restored. Furthermore, the hydrology directly downstream of the power plant outlet is affected by short-time regulation. The water level in the small reservoir may fluctuate by up to 0.5 m. A recurring problem in Sweden is pollution through Mercury, which is released from the ground through logging activities, causing a moderate pollution of the water body.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Test case topics=&lt;br /&gt;
===Fish population===&lt;br /&gt;
The fish species that can be found in the Mo are: salmon, sea trout, grayling, pike, perch, brown trout and crayfish.&lt;br /&gt;
During the summer from July to October, the power plant is shut down twice a week for one hour, releasing the discharge through the gates in order attract salmon into the residual area. However, after one hour this flow has still not reached downstream to the outlet of the power plant.&lt;br /&gt;
===Downstream migration===&lt;br /&gt;
To facilitate better downstream fish migration, a floating guidance device is attached right next to the intake, leading the fish into a smolt trap and then out to the downstream side of the dam. The license of 2012 states that this device shall be placed out 1 May every year and water released in the smolt trap shall be 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s. This solution was evaluated together with the authorities after the first year, 2016, and the conclusion was that it did not work as intended. In 2017 a new solution with fishing nets was tested, leading the smolts to the fishway instead. The water released to the smolt trap was then instead released to go through the fishway. The starting time for the installation fot he guidance device is moved to a flexible time due to when the reservoir is ice-free.&lt;br /&gt;
===Upstream migration===&lt;br /&gt;
The upstream migrating fish encounter the outlet of the power plant, located 4 km downstream the fishway. The attraction flow is represented by the minimum flow, 0.8 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s between the 15th of July and the 5th of October; 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s the rest of the year. At the end of the 4 km long residual area the upstream migration continues in the nature-like fishway. At the end of the nature-like fishway, there is a short concrete fish ladder for the final ascent into the reservoir.&lt;br /&gt;
===E-flow===&lt;br /&gt;
In the new license from 2012, the requirements are release of water in the fishway between the 15th of July and the 5th of October of 0.8 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s and the rest of the year 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s. During the same period one hour every Tuesday and Thursday, the power plant must shut down and release the full discharge through the gates in order to attract salmon up in the residual area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Research objectives and tasks=&lt;br /&gt;
The overall question at the HPP Anundsjø is how FIThydro can improve the situation for fish by different measures and means around the HPP. This includes the situation for the salmon smolt, which are mainly arriving at the HPP after being released in the upstream area. It also includes the situation of juvenile fish of different species as well as the possibility for salmon to pass on the way to spawn and back (influenced also by the HPP located downstream of Anundsjø and influencing especially the number of migrating fish).&lt;br /&gt;
===Research tasks===&lt;br /&gt;
The research tasks and field studies conducted at Anundsjö are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hydrodynamic conditions in the reservoir and their impact on downstream smolt migration&lt;br /&gt;
* Physical conditions in the nature-like fishway and its functionality for upstream migration of salmon&lt;br /&gt;
* Access and attraction to the bypassed river reach for upstream migration&lt;br /&gt;
* Use of advanced methods for mapping of bathymetry, measurements of water velocity and modelling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
The work focused on the reservoir (CNRS, SWECO, NTNU), the bypassed river reach with the fishway (NTNU) and the junction of the hydropower plant tunnel outlet and the river (TUM, SWECO, NTNU).  A telemetry study with smolt covered even a larger area including a stretch of the river upstream the reservoir and the downstream area until the bay of Örnsköldsvik (INBO). Scenario modelling applying different mitigation measures in a Bayesian network will all these areas (SINTEF).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ADCP was used to map the bathymetry of the reservoir, serving as input for hydrodynamic modelling. Combined with telemetry study of smolts, it is clear that the current configuration of a floating debris collector and a guidance device actually prevents smolts from finding a safe downstream migration pathway. The telemetry study shows that only 1 smolt managed to find a safe way for downstream migration when released in the bypass section just below the dam. The one-hour release of water to the bypassed reach of river twice a week, do not reach the confluence of the hydropower plant outlet and the river within an hour, and the attraction effect is not very clear. Water velocities seem to be too low to allow migration into bypassed reach without additional release of water. Detailed measurements of water velocities by ADV, and the use of drones and the Structure-for-motion-method to create bathymetry was used to validate the new double-averaging method of hydrodynamic modelling in 3D. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Gallery=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=packed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_reservoir.jpg|Reservoir at the Anundsjö hydropower plant.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_fishway.jpg|Aerial view of the Anundsjö upstream migration fishway.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_spillway.jpg|Downstream view of the Anundsjö dam spillway&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_fishpass_intake.jpg|Intake to the Anundsjö fishway.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_layout.png|Layout of the Anundsjö hydropower plant and surrounding area.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_floating_migration.png|Floating downstream fish migration device at Anundsjö hydropower plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ahar</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Anundsj%C3%B6_test_case&amp;diff=6337</id>
		<title>Anundsjö test case</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Anundsj%C3%B6_test_case&amp;diff=6337"/>
		<updated>2020-05-04T15:04:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ahar: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Test cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Fact box for Anundsjö}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Relevant SMTDs for Anundsjö}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
The Test Case is located on the small river Mo (Moälven) in the northern part of Sweden. The hydrology of the river Mo is typical for north of Sweden, with a lot of snow in the winter, a spring flood when the snow melts, low flows during the summer and often some higher flows and an autumn flood before the next winter starts with snow accumulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The catchment area is 820 km&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. Mean annual precipitation for the whole catchment area is approx. 727 mm per year, with a mean flow at the outlet into the Baltic Sea of 27.9 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s, and 10.2 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s at the HPP Anundsjø.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=About the hydropower plant=&lt;br /&gt;
The HPP is impounding a small reservoir, releasing the water through the turbines and a tunnel back into the river about 4km further downstream. It has an installed capacity of 5 MW. The mean annual discharge is 10 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s with a low flow of 2.21 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s.&lt;br /&gt;
===Layout===&lt;br /&gt;
A small reservoir of 0.5 ha is located upstream of the HPP Anundsjø. Further upstream are important areas of spawning for salmon and trout, which are not directly affected by the HPP. During the winter, a larger reservoir further upstream provides water to the HPP. The bypassed river reach between the dam and the outlet of the power plant is 4 km. This river reach receives an environmental flow release.&lt;br /&gt;
===The Operator: Statkraft===&lt;br /&gt;
Statkraft is a leading company in hydropower internationally and Europe’s largest generator of renewable energy. The Group produces hydropower, wind power, solar power, gas-fired power and supplies district heating. Statkraft is a global company in energy market operations. It is Norway's largest and the Nordic region's second largest power producer. [https://www.statkraft.com/ Read more.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Pressures on the water body's ecosystem=&lt;br /&gt;
Due to two dams downstream of the HPP, for which the fish passage efficiency is unknown, the continuity is moderate. Most parts of the rapids further downstream have been modified for timber floating, with only a few being restored. Furthermore, the hydrology directly downstream of the power plant outlet is affected by short-time regulation. The water level in the small reservoir may fluctuate by up to 0.5 m. A recurring problem in Sweden is pollution through Mercury, which is released from the ground through logging activities, causing a moderate pollution of the water body.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Test case topics=&lt;br /&gt;
===Fish population===&lt;br /&gt;
The fish species that can be found in the Mo are: salmon, sea trout, grayling, pike, perch, brown trout and crayfish.&lt;br /&gt;
During the summer from July to October, the power plant is shut down twice a week for one hour, releasing the discharge through the gates in order attract salmon into the residual area. However, after one hour this flow has still not reached downstream to the outlet of the power plant.&lt;br /&gt;
===Downstream migration===&lt;br /&gt;
To facilitate better downstream fish migration, a floating guidance device is attached right next to the intake, leading the fish into a smolt trap and then out to the downstream side of the dam. The license of 2012 states that this device shall be placed out 1 May every year and water released in the smolt trap shall be 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s. This solution was evaluated together with the authorities after the first year, 2016, and the conclusion was that it did not work as intended. In 2017 a new solution with fishing nets was tested, leading the smolts to the fishway instead. The water released to the smolt trap was then instead released to go through the fishway. The starting time for the installation fot he guidance device is moved to a flexible time due to when the reservoir is ice-free.&lt;br /&gt;
===Upstream migration===&lt;br /&gt;
The upstream migrating fish encounter the outlet of the power plant, located 4 km downstream the fishway. The attraction flow is represented by the minimum flow, 0.8 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s between the 15th of July and the 5th of October; 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s the rest of the year. At the end of the 4 km long residual area the upstream migration continues in the nature-like fishway. At the end of the nature-like fishway, there is a short concrete fish ladder for the final ascent into the reservoir.&lt;br /&gt;
===E-flow===&lt;br /&gt;
In the new license from 2012, the requirements are release of water in the fishway between the 15th of July and the 5th of October of 0.8 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s and the rest of the year 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s. During the same period one hour every Tuesday and Thursday, the power plant must shut down and release the full discharge through the gates in order to attract salmon up in the residual area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Research objectives and tasks=&lt;br /&gt;
The overall question at the HPP Anundsjø is how FIThydro can improve the situation for fish by different measures and means around the HPP. This includes the situation for the salmon smolt, which are mainly arriving at the HPP after being released in the upstream area. It also includes the situation of juvenile fish of different species as well as the possibility for salmon to pass on the way to spawn and back (influenced also by the HPP located downstream of Anundsjø and influencing especially the number of migrating fish).&lt;br /&gt;
===Research tasks===&lt;br /&gt;
The research tasks and field studies conducted at Anundsjö are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hydrodynamic conditions in the reservoir and their impact on downstream smolt migration&lt;br /&gt;
* Physical conditions in the nature-like fishway and its functionality for upstream migration of salmon&lt;br /&gt;
* Access and attraction to the bypassed river reach for upstream migration&lt;br /&gt;
* Use of advanced methods for mapping of bathymetry, measurements of water velocity and modelling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
The work focused on the reservoir (CNRS, SWECO, NTNU), the bypassed river reach with the fishway (NTNU) and the junction of the hydropower plant tunnel outlet and the river (TUM, SWECO, NTNU).  A telemetry study with smolt covered even a larger area including a stretch of the river upstream the reservoir and the downstream area until the bay of Örnsköldsvik (INBO). Scenario modelling applying different mitigation measures in a Bayesian network will all these areas (SINTEF).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ADCP was used to map the bathymetry of the reservoir, serving as input for hydrodynamic modelling. Combined with telemetry study of smolts, it is clear that the current configuration of a floating debris collector and a guidance device actually prevents smolts from finding a safe downstream migration pathway. The telemetry study shows that only 1 smolt managed to find a safe way for downstream migration when released in the bypass section just below the dam. The one-hour release of water to the bypassed reach of river twice a week, do not reach the confluence of the hydropower plant outlet and the river within an hour, and the attraction effect is not very clear. Water velocities seem to be too low to allow migration into bypassed reach without additional release of water. Detailed measurements of water velocities by ADV, and the use of drones and the Structure-for-motion-method to create bathymetry was used to validate the new double-averaging method of hydrodynamic modelling in 3D. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Gallery=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=packed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_reservoir.jpg|Reservoir at the Anundsjö hydropower plant.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_fishway.jpg|Aerial view of the Anundsjö upstream migration fishway.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_spillway.jpg|Downstream view of the Anundsjö dam spillway&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_fishpass_intake.jpg|Intake to the Anundsjö fishway.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_layout.png|Layout of the Anundsjö hydropower plant and surrounding area.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_floating_migration.png|Floating downstream fish migration device at Anundsjö hydropower plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ahar</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Anundsj%C3%B6_test_case&amp;diff=6336</id>
		<title>Anundsjö test case</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Anundsj%C3%B6_test_case&amp;diff=6336"/>
		<updated>2020-05-04T14:00:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ahar: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Test cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Fact box for Anundsjö}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Relevant SMTDs for Anundsjö}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
The Test Case is located on the small river Mo (Moälven) in the northern part of Sweden. The hydrology of the river Mo is typical for north of Sweden, with a lot of snow in the winter, a spring flood when the snow melts, low flows during the summer and often some higher flows and an autumn flood before the next winter starts with snow accumulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The catchment area is 820 km&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. Mean annual precipitation for the whole catchment area is approx. 727 mm per year, with a mean flow at the outlet into the Baltic Sea of 27.9 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s, and 10.2 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s at the HPP Anundsjø.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=About the hydropower plant=&lt;br /&gt;
The HPP is impounding a small reservoir, releasing the water through the turbines and a tunnel back into the river about 4km further downstream. It has an installed capacity of 5 MW. The mean annual discharge is 10 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s with a low flow of 2.21 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s.&lt;br /&gt;
===Layout===&lt;br /&gt;
A small reservoir of 0.5 ha is located upstream of the HPP Anundsjø. Further upstream are important areas of spawning for salmon and trout, which are not directly affected by the HPP. During the winter, a larger reservoir further upstream provides water to the HPP. The bypassed river reach between the dam and the outlet of the power plant is 4 km. This river reach receives an environmental flow release.&lt;br /&gt;
===The Operator: Statkraft===&lt;br /&gt;
Statkraft is a leading company in hydropower internationally and Europe’s largest generator of renewable energy. The Group produces hydropower, wind power, solar power, gas-fired power and supplies district heating. Statkraft is a global company in energy market operations. It is Norway's largest and the Nordic region's second largest power producer. [https://www.statkraft.com/ Read more.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Pressures on the water body's ecosystem=&lt;br /&gt;
Due to two dams downstream of the HPP, for which the fish passage efficiency is unknown, the continuity is moderate. Most parts of the rapids further downstream have been modified for timber floating, with only a few being restored. Furthermore, the hydrology directly downstream of the power plant outlet is affected by short-time regulation. The water level in the small reservoir may fluctuate by up to 0.5 m. A recurring problem in Sweden is pollution through Mercury, which is released from the ground through logging activities, causing a moderate pollution of the water body.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Test case topics=&lt;br /&gt;
===Fish population===&lt;br /&gt;
The fish species that can be found in the Mo are: salmon, sea trout, grayling, pike, perch, brown trout and crayfish.&lt;br /&gt;
During the summer from July to October, the power plant is shut down twice a week for one hour, releasing the discharge through the gates in order attract salmon into the residual area. However, after one hour this flow has still not reached downstream to the outlet of the power plant.&lt;br /&gt;
===Downstream migration===&lt;br /&gt;
To facilitate better downstream fish migration, a floating guidance device is attached right next to the intake, leading the fish into a smolt trap and then out to the downstream side of the dam. The license of 2012 states that this device shall be placed out 1 May every year and water released in the smolt trap shall be 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s. This solution was evaluated together with the authorities after the first year, 2016, and the conclusion was that it did not work as intended. In 2017 a new solution with fishing nets was tested, leading the smolts to the fishway instead. The water released to the smolt trap was then instead released to go through the fishway. The starting time for the installation fot he guidance device is moved to a flexible time due to when the reservoir is ice-free.&lt;br /&gt;
===Upstream migration===&lt;br /&gt;
The upstream migrating fish encounter the outlet of the power plant, located 4 km downstream the fishway. The attraction flow is represented by the minimum flow, 0.8 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s between the 15th of July and the 5th of October; 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s the rest of the year. At the end of the 4 km long residual area the upstream migration continues in the nature-like fishway. At the end of the nature-like fishway, there is a short concrete fish ladder for the final ascent into the reservoir.&lt;br /&gt;
===E-flow===&lt;br /&gt;
In the new license from 2012, the requirements are release of water in the fishway between the 15th of July and the 5th of October of 0.8 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s and the rest of the year 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s. During the same period one hour every Tuesday and Thursday, the power plant must shut down and release the full discharge through the gates in order to attract salmon up in the residual area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Research objectives and tasks=&lt;br /&gt;
The overall question at the HPP Anundsjø is how FIThydro can improve the situation for fish by different measures and means around the HPP. This includes the situation for the salmon smolt, which are mainly arriving at the HPP after being released in the upstream area. It also includes the situation of juvenile fish of different species as well as the possibility for salmon to pass on the way to spawn and back (influenced also by the HPP located downstream of Anundsjø and influencing especially the number of migrating fish).&lt;br /&gt;
===Research tasks===&lt;br /&gt;
The research tasks and field studies conducted at Anundsjö are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hydrodynamic conditions in the reservoir and their impact on downstream smolt migration&lt;br /&gt;
* Physical conditions in the nature-like fishway and its functionality for upstream migration of salmon&lt;br /&gt;
* Access and attraction to the bypassed river reach for upstream migration&lt;br /&gt;
* Use of advanced methods for mapping of bathymetry, measurements of water velocity and modelling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
The work focused on the reservoir (CNRS, SWECO, NTNU), the bypassed river reach with the fishway (NTNU) and the junction of the hydropower plant tunnel outlet and the river (TUM, SWECO, NTNU).  A telemetry study with smolt covered even a larger area including a stretch of the river upstream the reservoir and the downstream area until the bay of Örnsköldsvik (INBO). Scenario modelling applying different mitigation measures in a Bayesian network will all these areas (SINTEF).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ADCP was used to map the bathymetry of the reservoir, serving as input for hydrodynamic modelling. Combined with telemetry study of smolts, it is clear that the current configuration of a floating debris collector and a guidance device actually prevents smolts from finding a safe downstream migration pathway. The telemetry study shows that only 1 of 40 smolts managed to find a safe way for downstream migration. The one-hour release of water to the bypassed reach of river twice a week, do not reach the confluence of the hydropower plant outlet and the river within an hour, and the attraction effect is not very clear. Water velocities seem to be too low to allow migration into bypassed reach without additional release of water. Detailed measurements of water velocities by ADV, and the use of drones and the Structure-for-motion-method to create bathymetry was used to validate the new double-averaging method of hydrodynamic modelling in 3D. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Gallery=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=packed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_reservoir.jpg|Reservoir at the Anundsjö hydropower plant.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_fishway.jpg|Aerial view of the Anundsjö upstream migration fishway.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_spillway.jpg|Downstream view of the Anundsjö dam spillway&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_fishpass_intake.jpg|Intake to the Anundsjö fishway.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_layout.png|Layout of the Anundsjö hydropower plant and surrounding area.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_floating_migration.png|Floating downstream fish migration device at Anundsjö hydropower plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ahar</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Anundsj%C3%B6_test_case&amp;diff=6335</id>
		<title>Anundsjö test case</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Anundsj%C3%B6_test_case&amp;diff=6335"/>
		<updated>2020-05-04T13:38:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ahar: /* Research tasks */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Test cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Fact box for Anundsjö}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Relevant SMTDs for Anundsjö}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
The Test Case is located on the small river Mo (Moälven) in the northern part of Sweden. The hydrology of the river Mo is typical for north of Sweden, with a lot of snow in the winter, a spring flood when the snow melts, low flows during the summer and often some higher flows and an autumn flood before the next winter starts with snow accumulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The catchment area is 820 km&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. Mean annual precipitation for the whole catchment area is approx. 727 mm per year, with a mean flow at the outlet into the Baltic Sea of 27.9 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s, and 10.2 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s at the HPP Anundsjø.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=About the hydropower plant=&lt;br /&gt;
The HPP is impounding a small reservoir, releasing the water through the turbines and a tunnel back into the river about 4km further downstream. It has an installed capacity of 5 MW. The mean annual discharge is 10 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s with a low flow of 2.21 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s.&lt;br /&gt;
===Layout===&lt;br /&gt;
A small reservoir of 0.5 ha is located upstream of the HPP Anundsjø. Further upstream are important areas of spawning for salmon and trout, which are not directly affected by the HPP. During the winter, a larger reservoir further upstream provides water to the HPP. The bypassed river reach between the dam and the outlet of the power plant is 4 km. This river reach receives an environmental flow release.&lt;br /&gt;
===The Operator: Statkraft===&lt;br /&gt;
Statkraft is a leading company in hydropower internationally and Europe’s largest generator of renewable energy. The Group produces hydropower, wind power, solar power, gas-fired power and supplies district heating. Statkraft is a global company in energy market operations. It is Norway's largest and the Nordic region's second largest power producer. [https://www.statkraft.com/ Read more.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Pressures on the water body's ecosystem=&lt;br /&gt;
Due to two dams downstream of the HPP, for which the fish passage efficiency is unknown, the continuity is moderate. Most parts of the rapids further downstream have been modified for timber floating, with only a few being restored. Furthermore, the hydrology directly downstream of the power plant outlet is affected by short-time regulation. The water level in the small reservoir may fluctuate by up to 0.5 m. A recurring problem in Sweden is pollution through Mercury, which is released from the ground through logging activities, causing a moderate pollution of the water body.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Test case topics=&lt;br /&gt;
===Fish population===&lt;br /&gt;
The fish species that can be found in the Mo are: salmon, sea trout, grayling, pike, perch, brown trout and crayfish.&lt;br /&gt;
During the summer from July to October, the power plant is shut down twice a week for one hour, releasing the discharge through the gates in order attract salmon into the residual area. However, after one hour this flow has still not reached downstream to the outlet of the power plant.&lt;br /&gt;
===Downstream migration===&lt;br /&gt;
To facilitate better downstream fish migration, a floating guidance device is attached right next to the intake, leading the fish into a smolt trap and then out to the downstream side of the dam. The license of 2012 states that this device shall be placed out 1 May every year and water released in the smolt trap shall be 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s. This solution was evaluated together with the authorities after the first year, 2016, and the conclusion was that it did not work as intended. In 2017 a new solution with fishing nets was tested, leading the smolts to the fishway instead. The water released to the smolt trap was then instead released to go through the fishway. The starting time for the installation fot he guidance device is moved to a flexible time due to when the reservoir is ice-free.&lt;br /&gt;
===Upstream migration===&lt;br /&gt;
The upstream migrating fish encounter the outlet of the power plant, located 4 km downstream the fishway. The attraction flow is represented by the minimum flow, 0.8 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s between the 15th of July and the 5th of October; 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s the rest of the year. At the end of the 4 km long residual area the upstream migration continues in the nature-like fishway. At the end of the nature-like fishway, there is a short concrete fish ladder for the final ascent into the reservoir.&lt;br /&gt;
===E-flow===&lt;br /&gt;
In the new license from 2012, the requirements are release of water in the fishway between the 15th of July and the 5th of October of 0.8 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s and the rest of the year 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s. During the same period one hour every Tuesday and Thursday, the power plant must shut down and release the full discharge through the gates in order to attract salmon up in the residual area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Research objectives and tasks=&lt;br /&gt;
The overall question at the HPP Anundsjø is how FIThydro can improve the situation for fish by different measures and means around the HPP. This includes the situation for the salmon smolt, which are mainly arriving at the HPP after being released in the upstream area. It also includes the situation of juvenile fish of different species as well as the possibility for salmon to pass on the way to spawn and back (influenced also by the HPP located downstream of Anundsjø and influencing especially the number of migrating fish).&lt;br /&gt;
===Research tasks===&lt;br /&gt;
The research tasks and field studies conducted at Anundsjö are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hydrodynamic conditions in reservoir and their impact on downstream smolt migration&lt;br /&gt;
* Physical conditions in the nature-like fishway and its functionality for upstream migration of salmon&lt;br /&gt;
* Access to the bypassed river reach for upstream migration&lt;br /&gt;
* Use of advanced methods for mapping of bathymetry, measurements of water velocity and modelling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Gallery=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=packed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_reservoir.jpg|Reservoir at the Anundsjö hydropower plant.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_fishway.jpg|Aerial view of the Anundsjö upstream migration fishway.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_spillway.jpg|Downstream view of the Anundsjö dam spillway&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_fishpass_intake.jpg|Intake to the Anundsjö fishway.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_layout.png|Layout of the Anundsjö hydropower plant and surrounding area.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_floating_migration.png|Floating downstream fish migration device at Anundsjö hydropower plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ahar</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Anundsj%C3%B6_test_case&amp;diff=6278</id>
		<title>Anundsjö test case</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.fithydro.wiki/index.php?title=Anundsj%C3%B6_test_case&amp;diff=6278"/>
		<updated>2020-04-28T14:54:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ahar: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Test cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Fact box for Anundsjö}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Relevant SMTDs for Anundsjö}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
The Test Case is located on the small river Mo (Moälven) in the northern part of Sweden. The hydrology of the river Mo is typical for north of Sweden, with a lot of snow in the winter, a spring flood when the snow melts, low flows during the summer and often some higher flows and an autumn flood before the next winter starts with snow accumulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The catchment area is 820 km&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. Mean annual precipitation for the whole catchment area is approx. 727 mm per year, with a mean flow at the outlet into the Baltic Sea of 27.9 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s, and 10.2 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s at the HPP Anundsjø.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=About the hydropower plant=&lt;br /&gt;
The HPP is impounding a small reservoir, releasing the water through the turbines and a tunnel back into the river about 4km further downstream. It has an installed capacity of 5 MW. The mean annual discharge is 10 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s with a low flow of 2.21 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s.&lt;br /&gt;
===Layout===&lt;br /&gt;
A small reservoir of 0.5 ha is located upstream of the HPP Anundsjø. Further upstream are important areas of spawning for salmon and trout, which are not directly affected by the HPP. During the winter, a larger reservoir further upstream provides water to the HPP. The bypassed river reach between the dam and the outlet of the power plant is 4 km. This river reach receives an environmental flow release.&lt;br /&gt;
===The Operator: Statkraft===&lt;br /&gt;
Statkraft is a leading company in hydropower internationally and Europe’s largest generator of renewable energy. The Group produces hydropower, wind power, solar power, gas-fired power and supplies district heating. Statkraft is a global company in energy market operations. It is Norway's largest and the Nordic region's second largest power producer. [https://www.statkraft.com/ Read more.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Pressures on the water body's ecosystem=&lt;br /&gt;
Due to two dams downstream of the HPP, for which the fish passage efficiency is unknown, the continuity is moderate. Most parts of the rapids further downstream have been modified for timber floating, with only a few being restored. Furthermore, the hydrology directly downstream of the power plant outlet is affected by short-time regulation. The water level in the small reservoir may fluctuate by up to 0.5 m. A recurring problem in Sweden is pollution through Mercury, which is released from the ground through logging activities, causing a moderate pollution of the water body.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Test case topics=&lt;br /&gt;
===Fish population===&lt;br /&gt;
The fish species that can be found in the Mo are: salmon, sea trout, grayling, pike, perch, brown trout and crayfish.&lt;br /&gt;
During the summer from July to October, the power plant is shut down twice a week for one hour, releasing the discharge through the gates in order attract salmon into the residual area. However, after one hour this flow has still not reached downstream to the outlet of the power plant.&lt;br /&gt;
===Downstream migration===&lt;br /&gt;
To facilitate better downstream fish migration, a floating guidance device is attached right next to the intake, leading the fish into a smolt trap and then out to the downstream side of the dam. The license of 2012 states that this device shall be placed out 1 May every year and water released in the smolt trap shall be 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s. This solution was evaluated together with the authorities after the first year, 2016, and the conclusion was that it did not work as intended. In 2017 a new solution with fishing nets was tested, leading the smolts to the fishway instead. The water released to the smolt trap was then instead released to go through the fishway. The starting time for the installation fot he guidance device is moved to a flexible time due to when the reservoir is ice-free.&lt;br /&gt;
===Upstream migration===&lt;br /&gt;
The upstream migrating fish encounter the outlet of the power plant, located 4 km downstream the fishway. The attraction flow is represented by the minimum flow, 0.8 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s between the 15th of July and the 5th of October; 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s the rest of the year. At the end of the 4 km long residual area the upstream migration continues in the nature-like fishway. At the end of the nature-like fishway, there is a short concrete fish ladder for the final ascent into the reservoir.&lt;br /&gt;
===E-flow===&lt;br /&gt;
In the new license from 2012, the requirements are release of water in the fishway between the 15th of July and the 5th of October of 0.8 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s and the rest of the year 0.25 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/s. During the same period one hour every Tuesday and Thursday, the power plant must shut down and release the full discharge through the gates in order to attract salmon up in the residual area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Research objectives and tasks=&lt;br /&gt;
The overall question at the HPP Anundsjø is how FIThydro can improve the situation for fish by different measures and means around the HPP. This includes the situation for the salmon smolt, which are mainly arriving at the HPP after being released in the upstream area. It also includes the situation of juvenile fish of different species as well as the possibility for salmon to pass on the way to spawn and back (influenced also by the HPP located downstream of Anundsjø and influencing especially the number of migrating fish).&lt;br /&gt;
===Research tasks===&lt;br /&gt;
The research tasks and field studies conducted at Anundsjö are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bathymetry and velocity in reservoir&lt;br /&gt;
* Bathymetry of the fishway and the entrance with GPS and drone flights for Structure for Motion (SfM)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bathymetry, flow velocity data and drone flights for SfM and habitat in bypassed river reach&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Gallery=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=packed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_reservoir.jpg|Reservoir at the Anundsjö hydropower plant.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_fishway.jpg|Aerial view of the Anundsjö upstream migration fishway.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_spillway.jpg|Downstream view of the Anundsjö dam spillway&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_fishpass_intake.jpg|Intake to the Anundsjö fishway.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_layout.png|Layout of the Anundsjö hydropower plant and surrounding area.&lt;br /&gt;
anundsjö_floating_migration.png|Floating downstream fish migration device at Anundsjö hydropower plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ahar</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>