Costs of solutions - Revision history

Bendikhansen at 14:06, 9 October 2020

2020-10-09T14:06:32Z

Bendikhansen at 13:21, 8 October 2020

2020-10-08T13:21:36Z

Bendikhansen at 11:04, 8 October 2020

2020-10-08T11:04:23Z

Bendikhansen: /* References */

2020-10-08T11:03:50Z

References

Bendikhansen at 11:20, 30 September 2020

2020-09-30T11:20:36Z

Show changes

Bendikhansen at 11:05, 30 September 2020

2020-09-30T11:05:37Z

Bendikhansen at 11:04, 30 September 2020

2020-09-30T11:04:40Z

Bendikhansen at 11:04, 30 September 2020

2020-09-30T11:04:24Z

Bendikhansen at 11:01, 30 September 2020

2020-09-30T11:01:06Z

Bendikhansen at 10:59, 30 September 2020

2020-09-30T10:59:39Z

@@ Line 77: / Line 77: @@
 | style="text-align:right;" | 8
 |- style="vertical-align:middle;"
-| rowspan="19" | Fish migration
+| rowspan="18" | Fish migration
-| rowspan="11" | Downstream
+| rowspan="10" | Downstream
 | style="text-align:left;" | [[Migration   barrier removal]]
 | 2,000
@@ Line 123: / Line 123: @@
 | per m3/second
 | style="text-align:right;" | 11
 |- style="vertical-align:middle;"
 | style="text-align:left;" | [[Bottom-type intakes (Coanda screen, Lepine   water intake, etc) ]]
@@ Line 156: / Line 151: @@
 | 100,000
 | style="text-align:left;" | per vertical meter
-| style="text-align:right;" | 13,11
+| style="text-align:right;" | 19
 |- style="vertical-align:middle;"
 | style="text-align:left;" | [[Baffle fishways]]
@@ Line 184: / Line 179: @@
 | 20,000
 | style="text-align:left;" | per vertical meter
-| style="text-align:right;" | 13,16,19
+| style="text-align:right;" | 13
 |- style="vertical-align:middle;"
-| rowspan="8" | Sediment
+| style="text-align:left;" | Sediment
 | rowspan="2" | Routing
 | style="text-align:left;" | [[Drawdown   reservoir flushing]]
@@ Line 194: / Line 189: @@
 | style="text-align:right;" | 15,17
 |- style="vertical-align:middle;"
-| style="text-align:left;" | [[Sediment sluicing]]
+| rowspan="5" |
 | colspan="2" style="background-color:#D0CECE;" | NA
 | style="background-color:#D0CECE; text-align:left;" |
@@ Line 220: / Line 216: @@
 | style="text-align:left;" | per Vortex tube
 | style="text-align:right;" | 18
 |- style="vertical-align:middle;"
 | rowspan="3" | Environmental flow
@@ Line 250: / Line 235: @@
 | style="text-align:right; background-color:#D0CECE;" |
 |}
 Cost data is available on upstream fish migration and habitat measures, whereas data for environmental flow and sediment management is limited. In general, there are two types of costs associated with fish migration facilities, (i) the costs of the structure itself (concrete or nature-like) and (ii) the discharge to run the facility. While the costs of the structure are tangible, the costs associated with flow releases and sediment management depend on several factors. In addition to structural requirements, cost calculations for flow release and sediment management must consider dynamic processes (water regulation and release) as well as long-term adaptive management. Further, these measures are strongly linked to production losses, which can vary (sometimes hourly) based on power prices on the open power market.

@@ Line 156: / Line 156: @@
 | 100,000
 | style="text-align:left;" | per vertical meter
-| style="text-align:right;" |
+| style="text-align:right;" | 13,11
 |- style="vertical-align:middle;"
 | style="text-align:left;" | [[Baffle fishways]]
@@ Line 184: / Line 184: @@
 | 20,000
 | style="text-align:left;" | per vertical meter
-| style="text-align:right;" | 19
+| style="text-align:right;" | 13,16,19
 |- style="vertical-align:middle;"
 | rowspan="8" | Sediment
@@ Line 274: / Line 274: @@
 #Espa, P., Castelli, E., Crosa, G., and Gentili, G. (2013). Environmental effects of storage preservation practices: controlled flushing of fine sediment from a small hydropower reservoir. Environmental management, 52(1), 261-276.
 #Personal communication A. Doessegger (2020). Regionalwerke Schweiz.
-#Oesterreichs Energie Der Nationale Gewässerbewirtschaftungsplan 2009: Umgesetzte Maßnahmen der österreichischen Wasserkraft. Available online: https://oesterreichsenergie.at/der-nationale-gewaesserbewirtschaftungsplan-2009-umgesetzte-massnahmen-der-oesterreichischen-wasserkraft.html.
+#Thueringer State Office for the Environment, Mining and Nature Conservation (Landesamt für Umwelt, Bergbau und Naturschutz). Available online: https://tlubn.thueringen.de/wasser/fluesse-baeche/durchgaengigkeit/

@@ Line 184: / Line 184: @@
 | 20,000
 | style="text-align:left;" | per vertical meter
-| style="text-align:right;" |
+| style="text-align:right;" | 19
 |- style="vertical-align:middle;"
 | rowspan="8" | Sediment

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:03, 8 October 2020
Line 274:		Line 274:
	#Espa, P., Castelli, E., Crosa, G., and Gentili, G. (2013). Environmental effects of storage preservation practices: controlled flushing of fine sediment from a small hydropower reservoir. Environmental management, 52(1), 261-276.		#Espa, P., Castelli, E., Crosa, G., and Gentili, G. (2013). Environmental effects of storage preservation practices: controlled flushing of fine sediment from a small hydropower reservoir. Environmental management, 52(1), 261-276.
	#Personal communication A. Doessegger (2020). Regionalwerke Schweiz.		#Personal communication A. Doessegger (2020). Regionalwerke Schweiz.
		+	#Oesterreichs Energie Der Nationale Gewässerbewirtschaftungsplan 2009: Umgesetzte Maßnahmen der österreichischen Wasserkraft. Available online: https://oesterreichsenergie.at/der-nationale-gewaesserbewirtschaftungsplan-2009-umgesetzte-massnahmen-der-oesterreichischen-wasserkraft.html.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 One of the goals of the FIThydro project is to determine the financial costs of implementing ecological mitigation measures (solutions). During the project, costs associated with mitigation according to the categories of habitat, fish migration, sediment and flow were collected by consulting FIThydro partners via a questionnaire, examining the latest peer-reviewed literature, directly contacting European operators within the FIThydro network and using publically-available reports (Austria: Österreichs E-Wirtschaft, France: Hydro Electricité, Sweden: Vattenfall).
-The following table represents a summary of the results of the cost data obtained for the Deliverable 4.3 General Cost Figures for Relevant Solutions, Methods, Tools and Devices. The detailed report with all results can be accessed via https://www.fithydro.eu/deliverables-tech/ (D4.3) once it is published. The table is intended to provide a general impression of the cost dimensions for mitigation measures. The values should therefore be interpreted as the ranges of costs for measures, rather than precise costs. The range estimates are based on case studies from different regions (Europe, North America and Australia). The costs from different regions have been converted to EUR using the average 2010-2019 exchange rate (0.82 for USD/EUR and 1.46 for AUD/EUR). Since there was limited information on what each case study included in the costs (planning, construction, monitoring, etc.), the costs are assumed to account for the entire project – unless otherwise specified. The values have been rounded based on expert judgement for improved readability. Minimum costs were rounded down and maximum costs were rounded up to the following increments: 1, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 150, 200, 500, 1000, 2000, 5000, 10000, 150000, 100000, 1000000. If only one value is provided, the cost estimate is based on a single case study. This table does not imply any claim to completeness or freedom from error.
+The following table represents a summary of the results of the cost data obtained for the Deliverable 4.3 General Cost Figures for Relevant Solutions, Methods, Tools and Devices. The detailed report with all results can be accessed via https://www.fithydro.eu/deliverables-tech/ (D4.3). The table is intended to provide a general impression of the cost dimensions for mitigation measures. The values should therefore be interpreted as the ranges of costs for measures, rather than precise costs. The range estimates are based on case studies from different regions (Europe, North America and Australia). The costs from different regions have been converted to EUR using the average 2010-2019 exchange rate (0.82 for USD/EUR and 1.46 for AUD/EUR). Since there was limited information on what each case study included in the costs (planning, construction, monitoring, etc.), the costs are assumed to account for the entire project – unless otherwise specified. The values have been rounded based on expert judgement for improved readability. Minimum costs were rounded down and maximum costs were rounded up to the following increments: 1, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 150, 200, 500, 1000, 2000, 5000, 10000, 150000, 100000, 1000000. If only one value is provided, the cost estimate is based on a single case study. This table does not imply any claim to completeness or freedom from error.
 {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''Note: the info on this page is temporary''' [[file:broken]]
+One of the goals of the FIThydro project is to determine the financial costs of implementing ecological mitigation measures (solutions). During the project, costs associated with mitigation according to the categories of habitat, fish migration, sediment and flow were collected by consulting FIThydro partners via a questionnaire, examining the latest peer-reviewed literature, directly contacting European operators within the FIThydro network and using publically-available reports (Austria: Österreichs E-Wirtschaft, France: Hydro Electricité, Sweden: Vattenfall).
-One of the goals of the FIThydro project is to determine the financial costs of implementing mitigation measures (solutions).
+The following table represents a summary of the results of the cost data obtained for the Deliverable 4.3 General Cost Figures for Relevant Solutions, Methods, Tools and Devices. The detailed report with all results can be accessed via ----- LINK TO REPORT------. The table is intended to provide a general impression of the cost dimensions for mitigation measures. The values should therefore be interpreted as the ranges of costs for measures, rather than precise costs. The range estimates are based on case studies from different regions (Europe, North America and Australia). The costs from different regions have been converted to EUR using the average 2010-2019 exchange rate (0.82 for USD/EUR and 1.46 for AUD/EUR). Since there was limited information on what each case study included in the costs (planning, construction, monitoring, etc.), the costs are assumed to account for the entire project – unless otherwise specified. The values have been rounded based on expert judgement for improved readability. Minimum costs were rounded down and maximum costs were rounded up to the following increments: 1, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 150, 200, 500, 1000, 2000, 5000, 10000, 150000, 100000, 1000000. If only one value is provided, the cost estimate is based on a single case study. This table does not imply any claim to completeness or freedom from error.
 {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
@@ Line 252: / Line 252: @@
 |}
 #Personal communication G. Loy (2020). Verbund Innkraftwerke.
 #Personal communication J. Zehender (2020). Bayerische Landeskraftwerke.

@@ Line 252: / Line 252: @@
 |}
-# 1) Personal communication G. Loy (2020). Verbund Innkraftwerke.
+#Personal communication G. Loy (2020). Verbund Innkraftwerke.
-# 2) Personal communication J. Zehender (2020). Bayerische Landeskraftwerke.
+#Personal communication J. Zehender (2020). Bayerische Landeskraftwerke.
-# 3) Cramer, M.L. (ed) (2012). Stream Habitat Restoration Guidelines. Olympia, Washington, Washington Departments of Fish and Wildlife, Natural Resources, Transportation and Ecology, Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office, Puget Sound Partnership, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
+#Cramer, M.L. (ed) (2012). Stream Habitat Restoration Guidelines. Olympia, Washington, Washington Departments of Fish and Wildlife, Natural Resources, Transportation and Ecology, Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office, Puget Sound Partnership, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
-# 4) Cederholm, C.J., Bilby, R.E., Bisson, P.A., Bumstead, T.W., Fransen, B.R., Scarlett, W.J., and Ward, J.W. (1997). Response of juvenile coho salmon and steelhead to placement of large woody debris in a coastal washing stream. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 17: 947-963. (cited in: Fischenich, C., and J., Jr. Morrow (1999). Streambank Habitat Enhancement with Large Woody Debris. EMRRP Technical Notes Collection (ERDC TN-EMRRP-SR-13). U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.)
+#Cederholm, C.J., Bilby, R.E., Bisson, P.A., Bumstead, T.W., Fransen, B.R., Scarlett, W.J., and Ward, J.W. (1997). Response of juvenile coho salmon and steelhead to placement of large woody debris in a coastal washing stream. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 17: 947-963. (cited in: Fischenich, C., and J., Jr. Morrow (1999). Streambank Habitat Enhancement with Large Woody Debris. EMRRP Technical Notes Collection (ERDC TN-EMRRP-SR-13). U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.)
-# 5) CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game) (2004). Recovery strategy for California coho salmon. Report to the California Fish and Game Commission.
+#CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game) (2004). Recovery strategy for California coho salmon. Report to the California Fish and Game Commission.
-# 6) Garcia de Leaniz, C. (2008). “Weir removal in salmonid streams: implications, challenges and practicalities.” Hydrobiologia 609: 83-96.
+#Garcia de Leaniz, C. (2008). “Weir removal in salmonid streams: implications, challenges and practicalities.” Hydrobiologia 609: 83-96.
-# 7) Saldi-Caromile, K., Bates, K., Skidmore, P., Barenti, J., and Pineo, D. (2004). Stream Habitat Restoration Guidelines: Final Draft. Olympia, Washington, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington Departments of Ecology and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
+#Saldi-Caromile, K., Bates, K., Skidmore, P., Barenti, J., and Pineo, D. (2004). Stream Habitat Restoration Guidelines: Final Draft. Olympia, Washington, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington Departments of Ecology and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
-# 8) Evergreen (Evergreen Funding Consultants) (2003). A Primer on Habitat Project Costs. Prepared for the Puget Sound Shared Strategy.
+#Evergreen (Evergreen Funding Consultants) (2003). A Primer on Habitat Project Costs. Prepared for the Puget Sound Shared Strategy.
-# 9) Turnpenny, A.W.H., Struthers, G., and Hanson, P. (1998). A UK guide to intake fish-screening regulations, policy and best practice with particular reference to hydroelectric power schemes. Harwell Laboratory, Energy Technology Support Unit, UK.
+#Turnpenny, A.W.H., Struthers, G., and Hanson, P. (1998). A UK guide to intake fish-screening regulations, policy and best practice with particular reference to hydroelectric power schemes. Harwell Laboratory, Energy Technology Support Unit, UK.
-# 10) Dewitte, M., Courret, D., Laurent, D., and Adeva-Bustos, A. (2020). Comparison of solutions to restore a safe downstream migration of fish at a low-head run-of-river power-plant. Fish Passage 2020 - International Conference on River Connectivity.
+#Dewitte, M., Courret, D., Laurent, D., and Adeva-Bustos, A. (2020). Comparison of solutions to restore a safe downstream migration of fish at a low-head run-of-river power-plant. Fish Passage 2020 - International Conference on River Connectivity.
-# 11) Venus, T.E., Smialek, N., Pander, J., Harper, R., Adeva-Bustos, A., Harby, A., and Hansen, B. (2020). D4.3 General Cost Figures for Relevant Solutions, Methods, Tools and Devices. FIThydro Report.
+#Venus, T.E., Smialek, N., Pander, J., Harper, R., Adeva-Bustos, A., Harby, A., and Hansen, B. (2020). D4.3 General Cost Figures for Relevant Solutions, Methods, Tools and Devices. FIThydro Report.
-# 12) Ebel, G., Kehl, M., and Gluch, A. (2018). Fortschritte beim Fischschutz und Fisch-abstieg: Inbetriebnahme der Pilot-Wasserkraftanlagen Freyburg und Öblitz. Wasserwirtschaft, 108, 54-62.
+#Ebel, G., Kehl, M., and Gluch, A. (2018). Fortschritte beim Fischschutz und Fisch-abstieg: Inbetriebnahme der Pilot-Wasserkraftanlagen Freyburg und Öblitz. Wasserwirtschaft, 108, 54-62.
-# 13) Rutherfurd, I.D., Jerie, K., and Marsh, N. (2000). A Rehabilitation Manual for Australian Streams. Volume 2. Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation & Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology.
+#Rutherfurd, I.D., Jerie, K., and Marsh, N. (2000). A Rehabilitation Manual for Australian Streams. Volume 2. Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation & Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology.
-# 14) Porcher, J. P., and Larinier, M. (2002). Designing Fishways, Supervision of Construction, Costs, Hydraulic Model Studies. Bulletin Français de La Pêche et de La Pisciculture, (364 supplément), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2002100
+#Porcher, J. P., and Larinier, M. (2002). Designing Fishways, Supervision of Construction, Costs, Hydraulic Model Studies. Bulletin Français de La Pêche et de La Pisciculture, (364 supplément), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2002100
-# 15) Rovira, A., and Ibàñez, C. (2007). Sediment management options for the lower Ebro River and its delta. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 7(5), 285-295.
+#Rovira, A., and Ibàñez, C. (2007). Sediment management options for the lower Ebro River and its delta. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 7(5), 285-295.
-# 16) Pulg, U., Stranzl, S., Espedal, E., Postler, C., Gabrielsen, S., Alfredsen, K., and Fjeldstad, H.-P. (2020). Effektivitet og kost-nytte forhold av fysiske miljøtiltak i vassdrag Effektivitet og kost-nytte forhold av fysiske miljøtiltak i vassdrag. Bergen.
+#Pulg, U., Stranzl, S., Espedal, E., Postler, C., Gabrielsen, S., Alfredsen, K., and Fjeldstad, H.-P. (2020). Effektivitet og kost-nytte forhold av fysiske miljøtiltak i vassdrag Effektivitet og kost-nytte forhold av fysiske miljøtiltak i vassdrag. Bergen.
-# 17) Espa, P., Castelli, E., Crosa, G., and Gentili, G. (2013). Environmental effects of storage preservation practices: controlled flushing of fine sediment from a small hydropower reservoir. Environmental management, 52(1), 261-276.
+#Espa, P., Castelli, E., Crosa, G., and Gentili, G. (2013). Environmental effects of storage preservation practices: controlled flushing of fine sediment from a small hydropower reservoir. Environmental management, 52(1), 261-276.
-# 18) Personal communication A. Doessegger (2020). Regionalwerke Schweiz.
+#Personal communication A. Doessegger (2020). Regionalwerke Schweiz.