Radio telemetry

From FIThydrowiki
Revision as of 15:15, 1 June 2020 by Laurent (talk | contribs) (→‎Relevant literature)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quick summary

Figure 1: Two radio transmitters of different size (FCO)
Figure 2: Radio telemetry receiver (FCO).
Figure 3: Brown trout (Salmo trutta) with a radio transmitter in the body cavity and the external antenna (FCO).


Date:

Type: Method

Introduction

Radio telemetry is mainly used in freshwater (shallow streams and rivers) with a conductivity of < 500-1000 µSiemens/cm. A radio transmitter emits electromagnetic energy in the radio frequency range (between 30-300 MHz) and provides a possibility for remotely locating a fish. Digitally coded transmitters emit a unique code. A system can operate up to 1000 coded transmitters on one single frequency.

It is a gear intensive technique with the following components:

  • Transmitter, emitting the signal, attached to the fish, with battery and an antenna (Figure 1)
  • Mobile or fixed receiving antenna, capturing the radio signal, different types available; often loop or Yagi antenna are used.
  • Receiver, converting the radio signal into an electronic/audible form in order to identify the tagged fish (Figure 2)
  • Data logger, operates the receiver when the operator is absent
  • Cables/connectors connect the antenna to the receiver

The transmitters should be adjusted to the size of fish and the study goal. The transmitter weight should not exceed 2 % of the fish weight. Different sensors can record temperature, depth, and pressure. Miniaturization made transmitters with 0.2 g possible. Therefore small fishes (12-15 cm total length) can be equipped with these tiny transmitters.

The transmitters are implanted into the body cavity of the fish (Figure 3). Gastric (oesophagus) insertion or external attachment may be possible. The conductivity of the water and the depth of the transmitter in the river are the most critical parameters in detecting the radio signals.

Application

Radio telemetry is a standard tool for the study of spatial ecology and migration of fishes. It can be applied for a variety of fish migration studies. The passage corridor at a hydropower plant can be evaluated and information is gathered how the fish is approaching the site. The searching phase in front of a hydropower plant can be documented for downstream and upstream migrations.

Stationary and mobile tracking are often used. Stationary tracking continuously tracks a signal, but its application is limited to specific sites. Fish presence or absence at a site, and passage and movement rates between sites can be detected (Eiler, 2012). Mobile tracking allows the survey of an extended area.

The application for radio telemetry at hydropower plants is mainly detecting passage routes and linear migrations in a river system. However, acoustic telemetry became very popular and is more suitable for studies with the goal of documenting the detailed behaviour patterns of fishes in front of a hydropower plant (forebay). There are certain advantages and disadvantages for acoustic and radio telemetry. Both methods are adequate depending on the study objectives.

Radio telemetry is applied worldwide. Beeman et al (2012) published a comprehensive study on the effects of hydroelectric dams on fish populations on the Columbia River and on the Snake River. The downstream migration of Chinook salmon and anadromous rainbow trout at different sites were extensively documented.

Radio telemetry studies will be applied within the FIThydro project in the Aare River (HP Bannwil) to study the migration corridor and the timing of the migration. Mainly cyprinid fish species will be tracked. The main question is if fish are using the spillway corridor or if they migrate with the main flow through the turbine intakes. On the whole, the downstream migration of cyprinid fish species at hydropower plants has been incompletely studied so far and the Bannwil Test Case should contribute to a better understanding of cyprinid fish migration.

Relevant mitigation measures and test cases

Relevant measures
Baffle fishways
Bottom-type intakes (Coanda screen, Lepine water intake, etc)
Bypass combined with other solutions
Complete or partial migration barrier removal
Fish guidance structures with narrow bar spacing
Fish lifts, screws, locks, and others
Fish-friendly turbines
Fish refuge under hydropeaking conditions
Fishways for eels and lampreys
Mitigating rapid, short-term variations in flow (hydro-peaking operations)
Nature-like fishways
Operational measures (turbine operations, spillway passage)
Other types of fine screens
Pool-type fishways
Sensory, behavioural barriers (electricity, light, sound, air-water curtains)
Skimming walls (fixed or floating)
Truck transport
Vertical slot fishways
Relevant test cases Applied in test case?
Anundsjö test case Yes
Guma and Vadocondes test cases -

Other information

Radio telemetry is gear-intensive with high initial costs for the equipment, but also for transmitters, the preparation and station installation. Radio telemetry experiments have to be considered as animal experiments and special permissions from the local authorities are needed.

Relevant literature

  • Beeman, J. W., E. E. Hockersmith & J. R. Stevenson. (2012). Design and performance of radio telemetry systems for assessing juvenile fish passage at three hydroelectric dams. Pages 281-302 in N. S. Adams, J. W. Beeman & J. H. Eiler. Editors. Telemetry techniques: a user guide for fisheries research. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Eiler, J. H. (2012). Tracking aquatic animals with radio telemetry. Pages 163-204 in N. S. Adams, J. W. Beeman & J. H. Eiler. Editors. Telemetry techniques: a user guide for fisheries research. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.