File list
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This special page shows all uploaded files.
| Date | Name | Thumbnail | Size | Description | Versions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10:44, 26 January 2021 | Wsf double.png (file) |  |
413 KB | {{Information |author=Dominique Courret |source=Pôle Ecohydraulique AFB |description=Double vertical slots fishway: Puyoo weir on the Gave de Pau. }} | 1 |
| 10:42, 26 January 2021 | Wsf crosswall.png (file) |  |
19 KB | {{Information |author=Dominique Courret |source=Pôle Ecohydraulique AFB |description=Dimensions of typical cross-wall of a vertical slot fishway. }} | 1 |
| 10:42, 26 January 2021 | Wsf single paired.png (file) |  |
40 KB | {{Information |author=Michel Larinier |source=Larinier, M., Travade, F. et Porcher, J. P. 2002. Fishways: biological basis, design criteria and monitoring. 2002, p. 208. |description=Single and paired vertical slot fishway. }} | 1 |
| 15:06, 19 November 2020 | IBR las rives.png (file) |  |
295 KB | {{Information |author=Dominique Courret |source= |description=Construction and installation of the inclined trash racks of the HPP of Las Rives (France). }} | 1 |
| 15:05, 19 November 2020 | HBR params.png (file) |  |
90 KB | {{Information |author=Julian Master |source=Meister, J.; Fuchs, H.; Beck, C.; Albayrak, I.; Boes, R.M. (2020a). Head Losses of Horizontal Bar Racks as Fish Guidance Structures. Water, 12(2): 475. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w12020475. |description=Side view of an HBR illustrating different rack parameters; ho: approach flow depth, hds: downstream flow depth, Uo: mean upstream approach flow velocity from continuity, Uds: mean downstream flow velocity, hBo: bottom overlay height, hTo: top overlay... | 1 |
| 15:02, 19 November 2020 | HBR BS sketch.png (file) |  |
358 KB | {{Information |author=Julian Master |source=Meister, J.; Fuchs, H.; Beck, C.; Albayrak, I.; Boes, R.M. (2020a). Head Losses of Horizontal Bar Racks as Fish Guidance Structures. Water, 12(2): 475. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w12020475. |description=Side view of an HBR illustrating different rack parameters; ho: approach flow depth, hds: downstream flow depth, Uo: mean upstream approach flow velocity from continuity, Uds: mean downstream flow velocity, hBo: bottom overlay height, hTo: top overlay... | 1 |
| 15:00, 19 November 2020 | HBR schiffmühle.png (file) |  |
1.17 MB | {{Information |author=Julian Master, VAW |source= |description=The horizontal bar rack bypass system at the residual flow HPP Schiffmühle, Switzerland, during revision work in July 2018 }} | 1 |
| 14:57, 19 November 2020 | NBS types.jpg (file) |  |
20 KB | {{Information |author=Fatma Lemkecher |source=Lemkecher F. ; Chatellier L. ; Courret D. ; David L., (2020b). Contribution of different elements of inclined trash racks to head losses modelling. Water, 12(966). https://doi.org/10.3390/w12040966 |description=Type of fish guidance structures with narrow bar spacing: angled bar rack with vertical bars (top), vertical streamwise bars (middle), horizontal bars (bottom) }} | 1 |
| 14:55, 19 November 2020 | IBR schematic.png (file) |  |
30 KB | {{Information |author=Dominique Courret |source=Courret, D., Larinier M. (2008). Guide pour la conception de prises d’eau “ichtyo-compatibles” pour les petites centrales hydroélectriques [Guide for the design of fish-friendly intakes for small hydropower plants]. France: Agence de l’Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l’Energie (ADEME). Report No: RAPPORT GHAAPPE RA.08.04. http://www.onema.fr/IMG/pdf/2008_027.pdf (in French). |description=Longitudinal view of an inclined bar rack }} | 1 |
| 11:54, 27 October 2020 | DSS step 4.jpeg (file) |  |
135 KB | {{Information |author=Richard Noble |source= |description=Conceptual flow diagram of Step 4 of the proposed Decision Support System Framework – Risk-Based Decision of Scheme Plan OR Prioritised Cost-Efficient Mitigation Plan. Grey = outputs/inputs to/from steps; blue = tasks; White = FIThydro inputs and matrices; Green = final output/objective. }} | 1 |
| 11:51, 27 October 2020 | DSS step 3 SS.jpeg (file) |  |
158 KB | {{Information |author=Richard Noble |source= |description=FIThydro DSS new measures selection interface where the user is asked to select new measures per hazard class and to identify (where applicable) which existing measures require replacement (i.e. be removed), improvement with new designs and/or need further investigations in a detailed project plan. The interface provides the user with summary metrics on effectiveness and limitations from the measures catalogue and gives links to the wi... | 1 |
| 11:51, 27 October 2020 | DSS step 3.jpeg (file) |  |
126 KB | {{Information |author=Richard Noble |source= |description=Conceptual flow diagram of Step 3 of the proposed Decision Support System Framework – Risk-Based identification of Appropriate Mitigation Measures and Synergistic Solutions. Grey = outputs/inputs to/from steps; blue = tasks; White = FIThydro inputs and matrices; Green = final output/objective. }} | 1 |
| 11:45, 27 October 2020 | DSS step 2 SS.jpeg (file) |  |
139 KB | {{Information |author=Richard Noble |source= |description=FIThydro DSS ecological status risk matrix identifying the calculated Protect Site Score, Ecological Status Risk Score and indicating whether priority quality elements (fish, hydromorphology, continuity) are identified as a reason for failing the objectives and whether the HPP has been identified in river basin management plans to be significantly contributing to a failure to achieve good ecological status. These components are combine... | 1 |
| 11:44, 27 October 2020 | DSS step 2.jpeg (file) |  |
129 KB | {{Information |author=Richard Noble |source= |description=Conceptual flow diagram of Step 2 of the proposed Decision Support System Framework – Ecological Pressures and Impacts Characterisation and Risk Identification. Grey = outputs/inputs to/from steps; blue = tasks; White = FIThydro inputs and matrices; Green = final output/objective }} | 1 |
| 11:27, 27 October 2020 | DSS step 1 SS.jpeg (file) |  |
145 KB | 2 | |
| 11:14, 27 October 2020 | DSS step 1.svg (file) |  |
111 KB | 1 | |
| 11:08, 27 October 2020 | DSS step 1.jpeg (file) |  |
106 KB | == Summary == {{Information |author=Richard Noble |source= |description=Conceptual flow diagram of Step 1 of the proposed Decision Support System Framework - Pre-screening characterisation and risk identification. Grey = outputs/inputs to/from steps; blue = tasks; White = FIThydro inputs and matrices; Green = final output/objective. }} | 1 |
| 15:44, 26 October 2020 | DSS flow web.jpg (file) |  |
277 KB | Reverted to version as of 15:43, 26 October 2020 (UTC) | 3 |
| 15:41, 26 October 2020 | DSS flow web.png (file) |  |
583 KB | 2 | |
| 15:19, 26 October 2020 | DSS flow.png (file) |  |
223 KB | {{Information |author=Richard Noble |source= |description=Conceptual flow diagram of a risk-based Decision Support System to ensure environmentally friendly hydropower decision-making – Scenario 1 – risk assessment and mitigation planning for existing hydropower scheme(s). Grey = outputs/inputs to/from steps; blue = tasks; White = FIThydro inputs and matrices; Green = final output/objective }} | 1 |
| 12:32, 26 October 2020 | Curved bar rack 3d.png (file) |  |
2.28 MB | {{Information |author=Ismail Albayrak |source= |description=CBR-BS illustration of curved bar racks (wide bar spacing) }} | 1 |
| 12:26, 26 October 2020 | Schiffmühle HPP narrow.jpg (file) |  |
579 KB | {{Information |author=Ismail Albayrak |source= |description=Fish guidance structures with narrow bar spacing at Schiffmühle HPP, Switzerland.\ }} | 1 |
| 09:06, 26 October 2020 | Vertical slot fishway.jpg (file) |  |
632 KB | 1 | |
| 09:02, 26 October 2020 | Vertical slot fishway square.jpg (file) |  |
774 KB | {{Information |author=Laurent David |source= |description=Vertical slot fishway in Chatellerault, France. }} | 1 |
| 09:51, 23 October 2020 | Numerical modelling bannwil.jpg (file) |  |
288 KB | {{Information |author=Stephan Kammerer |source=VAW of ETH Zurich |description=Exemplary variant study for HPP Bannwil using numerical modelling. Normal (left) and tangential (right) flow velocities at potential FGS positions upstream of the turbine inlets for scenario 1a for fish guidance structures angled at 37° (see FIThydro Deliverable 2.2 for detailed information) }} | 1 |
| 09:50, 23 October 2020 | Velocity fields bannwil.jpg (file) |  |
364 KB | {{Information |author=Stephan Kammerer |source=VAW of ETH Zurich (background image: © 2018 swisstopo (JD 100041)) |description=Exemplary depth-averaged velocity fields [cm/s] upstream of HPP Bannwil measured with boat-mounted ADCP at a discharge of 402 m3/s }} | 1 |
| 09:47, 23 October 2020 | CBR schematic.jpg (file) |  |
550 KB | {{Information |author=Claudia Beck |source=Beck, C., Albayrak, I., Meister, J., Boes R.M. (2020a). Hydraulic performance of fish guidance structures with curved bars: Part 1: Head loss assessment. Journal of Hydraulic Research,58(5): 807-818, https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2019.1671515.; VAW of ETH Zurich |description=Top view of a schematic Curved Bar Rack arrangement with indicated rack angle α, power canal and bypass. The fish are guided along the rack towards the bypass, where they pass... | 1 |
| 09:43, 23 October 2020 | FGS layouts.jpg (file) |  |
4.9 MB | {{Information |author=Ismail Albayrak |source=VAW of ETH Zurich (Beck, C. (2019). Hydraulic and fish-biological performance of fish guidance structures with curved bars. In proc. 38th International Association for Hydro-Environmental Engineering and Research (IAHR) World Congress, Panama City, Panama, https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000371526.) |description=Different fish guidance structure layouts (a) Louver, (b) Angled Bar Rack (ABR), (c) Modified angled Bar Rack (MBR) and Curved-Bar Racks (... | 1 |
| 17:09, 12 October 2020 | Tables for SMTD input.xlsx (file) |  |
26 KB | Updated | 6 |
| 16:04, 12 October 2020 | Image description.png (file) |  |
1.02 MB | {{Information |author=Bendik Hansen |source= |description=Illustration of an image with the correct information }} | 1 |
| 08:46, 12 October 2020 | FPNM turning pool.jpg (file) |  |
16 KB | {{Information |author=Ana Quaresma (IST-ID) |source=https://www.fithydro.eu/guma-vadocondes/ |description=Detailed results for a turning pool in the pool-type fishway at Guma HPP obtained with 3D numerical modelling. }} | 1 |
| 08:45, 12 October 2020 | FPNM isosurface.jpg (file) |  |
25 KB | {{Information |author=Ana Quaresma (IST-ID) |source= |description=Isosurface of the mean velocity in the fishway at Guma HPP. }} | 1 |
| 08:44, 12 October 2020 | FPNM guma aerial.jpg (file) |  |
103 KB | {{Information |author=Ana Quaresma (IST-ID) |source= |description=Aerial view of the pool-type fishway at Guma HPP }} | 1 |
| 08:42, 12 October 2020 | FPNM guma 3d.jpg (file) |  |
24 KB | {{Information |author=Ana Quaresma (IST-ID) |source= |description=Mean velocity magnitude in several cross sections for the area downstream Guma HPP obtained with 3D numerical modelling }} | 1 |
| 08:40, 12 October 2020 | FPNM guma 2d.jpg (file) |  |
13 KB | {{Information |author=Author: Ana Quaresma (IST-ID) |source=https://www.fithydro.eu/guma-vadocondes/ |description=Depth averaged velocity for the area downstream Guma HPP obtained with 2D numerical modelling. }} | 1 |
| 08:39, 12 October 2020 | FPNM guma.png (file) |  |
293 KB | {{Information |author=Author: Ana Quaresma (IST-ID) |source= |description=Aerial view of the area downstream Guma HPP. }} | 1 |
| 14:58, 9 October 2020 | SHP planned.png (file) |  |
1.5 MB | {{Information |author=Pro Naturstrom GmbH |source= |description=Visualization of the planned 300kW HYDROSHAFT powerplant at the historic Luitpold weir at the Saalach River in Bad-Reichenhall, Bavaria. Germany. }} | 1 |
| 14:57, 9 October 2020 | SHP install.jpg (file) |  |
221 KB | {{Information |author= |source=TU Munich |description=Setting in place of the 420kW turbine. Instead of classical stop-logs a metal shield holds the shaft dry for mounting and revisions. }} | 1 |
| 14:56, 9 October 2020 | SHP aerial2.jpg (file) |  |
412 KB | |author= |source=TU Munich |description= Aerial view of the two shafts with four trash-rack modules at Großweil, Bavaria. Germany. }} | 1 |
| 14:55, 9 October 2020 | SHP aerial1.jpg (file) |  |
392 KB | |author= |source=TU Munich |description=Aerial view of the 420kW HYDROSHAFT powerplant at the Loisach River in Großweil, Bavaria. Germany. }} | 1 |
| 14:42, 9 October 2020 | SHP functionality.png (file) |  |
171 KB | |author= |source=TU Munich |description=Functionality of the HYDROSHAFT concept. (Copyright TU Munich) }} | 1 |
| 13:11, 9 October 2020 | IDA damage.png (file) |  |
26 KB | {{Information |author= |source= |description=Comparison of observed damage rates for fish passage without (blue) and with IDA pilot device (red) for varying fish lengths (total length TL) in the 35 kW pilot. }} | 1 |
| 13:10, 9 October 2020 | IDA pilot.png (file) |  |
934 KB | {{Information |author= |source= |description=IDA pilot at the 35 kW Kaplan turbine intake at the TUM Lab with the two ring-shaped copper electrodes }} | 1 |
| 13:10, 9 October 2020 | IDA fish path.png (file) |  |
379 KB | {{Information |author= |source= |description=Schematic sketch of fish passage through a vertical axis Kaplan turbine without (left) and with (right) IDA device. }} | 1 |
| 12:00, 9 October 2020 | Fish refuge overhead cover square.png (file) |  |
195 KB | 1 | |
| 10:28, 9 October 2020 | Fish refuge circular flow chart.png (file) |  |
289 KB | {{Information |author= |source=Adapted from Costa, M., Pinheiro, A., Boavida, I., 2019. Habitat Enhancement Solutions for Iberian Cyprinids Affected by Hydropeaking: Insights from Flume Research. Sustainability 11, 6998. doi:10.3390/su11246998 |description=Circular flow chart displaying a potential sequence of steps to study the impacts of hydropeaking in flume conditions and to propose mitigation measures accordingly. }} | 1 |
| 10:27, 9 October 2020 | Fish refuge flume config.png (file) |  |
120 KB | {{Information |author=Maria João Costa |source= |description=Flume configuration for each trial and details of the tested flow-refuges. A: i) parallel upstream deflectors and ii) alternate downstream deflectors; B: one-sided deflectors; C: Overhead cover (L-structures),. DL, IL and UL: downstream, inside and upstream overhead cover refuge areas respectively. All dimensions are in meters (m) except for E. }} | 1 |
| 10:26, 9 October 2020 | Fish refuge overhead cover.png (file) |  |
372 KB | {{Information |author=Maria João Costa |source= |description=Overhead cover tested in the indoor flume. }} | 1 |
| 10:26, 9 October 2020 | Fish refuge lateral deflectors.png (file) |  |
457 KB | {{Information |author=Maria João Costa |source= |description=Lateral deflector tested at the indoor flume. }} | 1 |
| 14:04, 8 October 2020 | Dam flow layers.png (file) |  |
50 KB | {{Information |author= |source=https:Ferraro, Domenico, Sergio Servidio, Vincenzo Carbone, Subhasish Dey, and Roberto Gaudio. 2016. ‘Turbulence Laws in Natural Bed Flows’. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 798 (July): 540–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.334 Add to Citavi project by DOI. |description=Subdivison of turbulent open channel flow into flow layers }} | 1 |
