Difference between revisions of "Mitigating rapid, short-term variations in flow (hydro-peaking operations)"
Bendikhansen (talk | contribs) |
Bendikhansen (talk | contribs) (Undo revision 1772 by Bendikhansen (talk)) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==During operation== | ==During operation== | ||
− | + | environmental effect of the released environmental flow must be done by assessing the development of the fish population, e.g. by monitoring juvenile fish densities, number of smolts, etc. | |
=Classification table= | =Classification table= | ||
<table border="1"> | <table border="1"> |
Revision as of 13:59, 20 June 2019
Contents
Introduction
Methods, tools, and devices
During planning
During implementation
During operation
environmental effect of the released environmental flow must be done by assessing the development of the fish population, e.g. by monitoring juvenile fish densities, number of smolts, etc.
Classification table
Assessment criteria |
Assessment |
Fish species measure designed for |
(All) Atlantic salmon (salmo salar) Trout (salmo trutta) |
Which life-stage of fish is measure aimed at? |
(All, but primarily younger age classes) Spawning / Recruitment Juvenile habitat (0+) Juvenile habitat (1+) Juvenile habitat (older than 1+) Adult fish Downstream migration Upstream migration |
Which physical parameter mitigated? |
Water velocity Water depth Water-covered areas |
Section in the regulated system measure designed for |
Downstream outlet of plant |
River type implemented in |
All |
Climatic region suitable for |
(All) A: Tropical (mega-thermal) climates B: Dry (arid and semiarid) climates C: Temperate (mesothermal) climates D: Continental (microthermal) climates E: Polar and alpine (montane) climates |
Level of certainty in effect |
Very certain |
Technology readiness level (maturity) |
TRL 8-9 |