Difference between revisions of "Hydropeaking tool"
Bendikhansen (talk | contribs) |
Bendikhansen (talk | contribs) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
=Introduction= | =Introduction= | ||
The ''Hydropeaking Tool'' was designed to assess the impacts of hydropeaking on fish populations in regulated rivers. It is available as an Excel file. | The ''Hydropeaking Tool'' was designed to assess the impacts of hydropeaking on fish populations in regulated rivers. It is available as an Excel file. | ||
| − | The hydropeaking tool is based on a method for assessing impacts from hydropeaking developed for salmonids at SINTEF Energy as a part of the CEDREN EnviPeak project (Norwegian Research Council, Grant number 193818). | + | The hydropeaking tool is based on a method for assessing impacts from hydropeaking developed for salmonids at SINTEF Energy as a part of the [[https://www.cedren.no/english/home CEDREN]] EnviPeak project (Norwegian Research Council, Grant number 193818). |
| − | + | In FIThydro, the Hydropeaking Tool has been developed also for Iberian barbel and grayling, in addition to salmonids. Factors, criteria and thresholds that determine the assessment for these species have been modified based on available literature and expert knowledge. | |
=Application= | =Application= | ||
| − | In the Hydropeaking tool, the impacts from hydropeaking are divided into two axis: direct effects from hydropeaking and vulnerability of the fish population to hydropeaking. The effect axis characterises the possible ecological impacts of peaking from how physical conditions such as flow, water level and water covered area changes, given the hydropower system and river morphology. The vulnerability axis characterises how vulnerable the system is to further influence from peaking. Both axis may be evaluated separately, but we also provide a system to combine them and obtain an overall assessment of hydropeaking (Figure 1) | + | In the Hydropeaking tool, the impacts from hydropeaking are divided into two axis: direct effects from hydropeaking and vulnerability of the fish population to the additional impact from hydropeaking. The starting point is not a natural river, but a hydropower regulated river that are operating without peaking. The effect axis characterises the possible ecological impacts of peaking from how physical conditions such as flow, water level and water covered area changes, given the hydropower system and river morphology. The vulnerability axis characterises how vulnerable the system is to further influence from peaking. Both axis may be evaluated separately, but we also provide a system to combine them and obtain an overall assessment of hydropeaking (Figure 1). |
| − | The current version of the Hydropeaking Tool is available in Microsoft Excel. The user has to enter | + | The current version of the Hydropeaking Tool is available in Microsoft Excel. The user has to enter input values for effects and vulnerability parameters for the studied river in corresponding tables. These input values can be obtained from numerical modelling, analysis of water level/discharge time series, and fieldwork. |
The outputs from the Hydropeaking Tool are the score of effects factors, the score of vulnerability factors, and the score for the combined assessment (Figure 2). | The outputs from the Hydropeaking Tool are the score of effects factors, the score of vulnerability factors, and the score for the combined assessment (Figure 2). | ||
| − | The Hydropeaking Tool aims at being used to assess existing or planned hydropeaking. It also gives the user a possibility to see which parameters have a low score, helping to identify where mitigation should be concentrated. | + | The Hydropeaking Tool aims at being used to assess existing or planned hydropeaking operations. It also gives the user a possibility to see which parameters have a low score, helping to identify where mitigation should be concentrated. |
=Relevant mitigation measures and test cases= | =Relevant mitigation measures and test cases= | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
=Other information= | =Other information= | ||
| − | The Hydropeaking tool | + | The Hydropeaking tool is described as a part of [https://www.fithydro.eu/deliverables-tech/ deliverable D3.2] of the FITHydro project. Application of the tool is also a part of the deliverable. |
| + | |||
=Relevant literature= | =Relevant literature= | ||
*Harby et al., J. 2016. A method to assess impacts from Hydropeaking. Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Melbourne, Australia. | *Harby et al., J. 2016. A method to assess impacts from Hydropeaking. Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Melbourne, Australia. | ||
*Bakken, T.H., Forseth, T and Harby (2016), Miljøvirkninger av effektkjøring: kunnskapsstatus og råd til forvaltning og industri. NINA Special Report 62, Trondheim, Norway. | *Bakken, T.H., Forseth, T and Harby (2016), Miljøvirkninger av effektkjøring: kunnskapsstatus og råd til forvaltning og industri. NINA Special Report 62, Trondheim, Norway. | ||
| − | *Forseth, T and Harby (2014), A. Handbook for environmental design in regulated salmon rivers. NINA Special Report 53, Trondheim, Norway. | + | *Forseth, T and Harby (2014), [[https://www.nina.no/archive/nina/PppBasePdf/temahefte/053.pdf A. Handbook for environmental design in regulated salmon rivers]]. NINA Special Report 53, Trondheim, Norway. |
| − | |||
=Contact information= | =Contact information= | ||
| + | atle.harby@sintef.no | ||
[[Category:Tools]] [[Category:developed in FIThydro]] | [[Category:Tools]] [[Category:developed in FIThydro]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:24, 2 December 2020
Contents
Quick summary
Developed by: SINTEF Energy Research
Date: Under development
Type: Tool
Introduction
The Hydropeaking Tool was designed to assess the impacts of hydropeaking on fish populations in regulated rivers. It is available as an Excel file. The hydropeaking tool is based on a method for assessing impacts from hydropeaking developed for salmonids at SINTEF Energy as a part of the [CEDREN] EnviPeak project (Norwegian Research Council, Grant number 193818).
In FIThydro, the Hydropeaking Tool has been developed also for Iberian barbel and grayling, in addition to salmonids. Factors, criteria and thresholds that determine the assessment for these species have been modified based on available literature and expert knowledge.
Application
In the Hydropeaking tool, the impacts from hydropeaking are divided into two axis: direct effects from hydropeaking and vulnerability of the fish population to the additional impact from hydropeaking. The starting point is not a natural river, but a hydropower regulated river that are operating without peaking. The effect axis characterises the possible ecological impacts of peaking from how physical conditions such as flow, water level and water covered area changes, given the hydropower system and river morphology. The vulnerability axis characterises how vulnerable the system is to further influence from peaking. Both axis may be evaluated separately, but we also provide a system to combine them and obtain an overall assessment of hydropeaking (Figure 1).
The current version of the Hydropeaking Tool is available in Microsoft Excel. The user has to enter input values for effects and vulnerability parameters for the studied river in corresponding tables. These input values can be obtained from numerical modelling, analysis of water level/discharge time series, and fieldwork.
The outputs from the Hydropeaking Tool are the score of effects factors, the score of vulnerability factors, and the score for the combined assessment (Figure 2).
The Hydropeaking Tool aims at being used to assess existing or planned hydropeaking operations. It also gives the user a possibility to see which parameters have a low score, helping to identify where mitigation should be concentrated.
Relevant mitigation measures and test cases
| Relevant measures | |
|---|---|
| Fish refuge under hydropeaking conditions | |
| Mitigating rapid, short-term variations in flow (hydro-peaking operations) | |
| Mitigating reduced annual flow and low flow measures | |
| Mitigating reduced flood peaks, magnitudes, and frequency | |
| Relevant test cases | Applied in test case? |
| Anundsjö test case | - |
| Bragado test case | Yes |
Other information
The Hydropeaking tool is described as a part of deliverable D3.2 of the FITHydro project. Application of the tool is also a part of the deliverable.
Relevant literature
- Harby et al., J. 2016. A method to assess impacts from Hydropeaking. Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Melbourne, Australia.
- Bakken, T.H., Forseth, T and Harby (2016), Miljøvirkninger av effektkjøring: kunnskapsstatus og råd til forvaltning og industri. NINA Special Report 62, Trondheim, Norway.
- Forseth, T and Harby (2014), [A. Handbook for environmental design in regulated salmon rivers]. NINA Special Report 53, Trondheim, Norway.
Contact information
atle.harby@sintef.no
