Difference between revisions of "3D sensorless, ultrasound fish tracking"

From FIThydrowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
'''NOTE: patent pending, intentionally left blank due to WIKI being public.'''
+
'''NOTE: patent pending, intentionally left blank due to WIKI being public.''
 +
{{Suitable measures for 3D sensorless, ultrasound fish tracking}}
 
=Quick summary=
 
=Quick summary=
  

Revision as of 11:18, 20 January 2020

'NOTE: patent pending, intentionally left blank due to WIKI being public.

Relevant measures
Baffle fishways
Bottom-type intakes (Coanda screen, Lepine water intake, etc)
Bypass combined with other solutions
Complete or partial migration barrier removal
Fish guidance structures with narrow bar spacing
Fish lifts, screws, locks, and others
Fish-friendly turbines
Fish refuge under hydropeaking conditions
Fishways for eels and lampreys
Mitigating rapid, short-term variations in flow (hydro-peaking operations)
Nature-like fishways
Operational measures (turbine operations, spillway passage)
Other types of fine screens
Pool-type fishways
Sensory, behavioural barriers (electricity, light, sound, air-water curtains)
Skimming walls (fixed or floating)
Truck transport
Vertical slot fishways
Relevant test cases Applied in test case?
Altheim test case -
Altusried test case -
Anundsjö test case -
Freudenau test case -
Gotein test case -
Guma and Vadocondes test cases -
Günz test case -
Ham test case -
Las Rives test case -
Trois Villes test case -

Quick summary

Developed by: Chair of Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering, Chair of Non-Destructive Testing, TU Munich

Date: February 2019

Type: Device, Method

Suitable for the following measures:

Introduction

Application

Other information

European patent applied (application 15 188 223.0-1020)

Relevant literature

Contact information